Syfy (previously known as the Sci-Fi Channel) went through a minor renaissance in the late 90s and early aughts, producing television that set the bar for a lot of fascinating entertainment to come. Without shows like Farscape, Battlestar Galactica, and Stargate, it is doubtful that the current television milieu—where shows like Westworld and American Gods are considered high quality entertainment—would exist in the same form.
This was also the same era in which they developed two Dune miniseries. The first came in 2000.
Frank Herbert’s Dune was a massive production for a television project, with any estimated twenty million dollar budget for three film-length episodes that encompassed each “book” within the Dune novel. It featured an international cast and won Emmys for effects and cinematography. It was a massive undertaking for the channel, and to this day it remains (along with its sequel Children of Dune) among the highest three rated programs that Syfy has every produced.
The Dune miniseries is an excellent place to delineate the line between how close an adaptation of a book should run in order to make for a good viewing experience. This is a question that always needs considering when literature makes the turn to cinema, but the balance is rarely achieved. And while the Syfy miniseries is better than any other version on offer, it doesn’t reach spectacular heights due to the desire to be as close to the written text as possible.
Among the parts that sit strangely is the pacing of the whole thing; while the idea of giving each section of the book its own film-length treatment seems sound, the story naturally drags at certain points in the book that work in prose but not on screen. There are also places where it seem as though the narrative gets over-explained in an effort to be sure that no one watching is left behind. It’s a good instinct, but it can get tedious in places. There are lines that seem lifted from a careful checklist of What Must Be in A Dune Movie: “Oh good, we got that bit in. Now this bit.”
The cast is a fascinating array of performers, but some fulfill their parts better than others. Scottish actor Alec Newman was selected to play Paul Atreides, and he isn’t quite eerie enough when the occasion calls for it. He’s also too old to play the part, but that was a conscious decision of the part of the writer-director John Harrison—he was concerned that he wouldn’t be able to find the right talent if Paul were cast as a teenager. The problem with making that choice is that the script actually pens him as more teenager-like than the book ever did; Paul has plenty of moments were he is petulant and overly-stubborn and fails to discern the motives of others the way Paul does in the novel. Making that change would have been fine with a teenaged actor, but it’s odd coming from someone who is clearly 25 years old. He gains his footing more as the story goes on, but it’s a odd way to begin.
William Hurt is not the person that I’d normally consider for Duke Leto, but he brings a certain reserved calm that works for the character. Saskia Reeves, on the other hand, embodies everything that you would expect from Lady Jessica in both bearing and commanding presence. Barbara Kodetová is divine as Chani in both her sensitivity and fierceness, and Uwe Ochsenknecht makes a wonderfully gruff Stilgar. Somehow Matt Kessler (later of Middleman fame) is playing Feyd-Rautha, and it’s the strangest casting choice you’ve ever seen, but it’s also hard not to love the strangeness of it. Giancarlo Giannini was an excellent pick for Emperor Shaddam, and it’s always amazing to see him act through an array of increasingly improbable costumes.
But the real gold standard is born by Ian McNiece, who manages to make the Baron Harkonnen—easily one of the most despicable characters in science fiction literature—every bit as conniving and vicious as he needs to be… and every bit as fascinating. McNiece has a superb sense of how to make the baron mesmerizing to watch no matter how odiously he behaves; when so much of the narrative turns on paying attention to Harkonnen scheming, it is desperately important that their plotting holds our attention. Every time he ends his scenes on one of those goofy rhymes, you kind of want to punch the air and groan at the same time.
One of the only places where the miniseries deviates from the novel is arguably the smartest change it makes in the adaptation; the choice to make Irulan an active participant in the narrative, making her way through the machinations of the other houses to learn the truth about what is going on between her father, House Harkonnen, and House Atreides. It doesn’t always work (the point where she goes to see Feyd seems particularly silly, as it couldn’t be more obvious that she’s attempting to get information out of him), but when it does, it helps to keep the audience apace of what’s going on. Irulan’s position prevents a lot of unnecessary infodumping because she learns as she goes and informs the viewer as a result—preventing the need for a lot of ridiculous voiceover work (hi, David Lynch). Her appearance at the dinner party hosted by House Atreides in the first episode is such a smart reworking that I sometimes forget she doesn’t show up to the party in the novel. Julie Cox is elegant and cunning with the part, and makes Irulan’s own journey every bit as interesting as Paul’s on the flip side of the political machine.
The effects of this series read like a master class in making a relatively small (for the scale of the project) budget work like magic. While plenty of the special effects shots are clearly reused throughout, they are still well-rendered. The matte backdrop paintings used in the desert sequences are gorgeous, and while an occasional sound stage effect is discernible from not shooting the desert scenes outdoors, it is still an impressive feat. The Fremen blue-eye effect was achieved in a fascinating way—the actors were given UV contact lenses and then filmed with special cameras to catch the light. As a result, the glow of Fremen eyes is particularly riveting in this version. The soundtrack is also beautifully evocative of the the atmosphere, an impressive turn out by Graeme Revell.
But the real heroes of this miniseries are the people who did the design work. The costumes and sets are gorgeously appointed and so shrewdly thought through; the Bene Gesserit garb is utterly unique but still has a vague sense of “nun” about it, the complicated construction of Irulan’s hats and gowns are gravity-defying and glorious, activities shown in the sietches are varied and vibrant, the separation of various groups by color selection and fabrics and symbols is clear and concise. The fight choreography positively sparkles in all the places where it counts. Also, the stillsuits actually look like reasonable interpretations of what a stillsuit should look like, blending into the desert surroundings, built like functional everyday clothing. The people who were constructing this world clearly loved it, and it shows in every frame. For so much detail to come through in a television miniseries on a cable network is astounding, and it reads like a much grander project that was rolling in money.

There are thematic resonances that get lost in the version. Despite wanting to stick close to the book, it seems as though effectively communicating how dark Paul’s journey becomes is difficult for most writers and directors to stomach. (Paul doesn’t make it rain in this version, but he does make a Madhi statue into a waterfall, briefly, with no indication of where that ability suddenly comes from.) The indication that Paul’s victory will lead to endless war and suffering is never carefully communicated in this version, likely to prevent the audience from coming away with a poor opinion of their protagonist.
Knowing all that… I would argue that while this version of Dune is impressive to look at, its successor—the Children of Dune miniseries—outstrips it in the end. We will get to it soon, but for now, this miniseries is the best possible version of Dune that you can find on screen. And it’s a great tool for introducing friends (if they won’t read the book, of course) into the fold. It is hard not to love any adaptation that clearly has so much love for its source.
Emmet Asher-Perrin wishes people actually dressed the way they do in the miniseries… sometimes. You can bug her on Twitter and Tumblr, and read more of her work here and elsewhere.
I couldn’t agree more. I watched this series and its sequel before I read the books. They were my gateway. If it hadn’t been for these, it might have been years before I actually read them. For everything they get wrong, they get much more right. This is the primary reason as to why I think that any future adaption of Dune needs to be done on television. Even if you love Lynch’s effort, it is very difficult to deny that this miniseries translates the book infinity better.
I definitely need to rewatch this again. I agree it’s the best version we’ve gotten to date, although I thought some of the costuming & design choices were … questionable. But I’d need to rewatch to point to specific examples.
Yes, Ian McNiece was a highlight.
This mini-series was my gateway to the Dune Universe. After watching it, I picked up every bit of Dune I could find, and read it all. Because of that, I will always have fond memories of the series.
I first read Dune almost 40 years ago and I agree that this is the best adaptation of the novel. I also agree Children of Dune was even better.
Aw yeah!
I enjoy this miniseries so much and it’s kind of sad when people equate Dune to the Lynch one. As I usually tell them: the miniseries is so much better, just so much truer to the book.
I’d somehow never consciously noticed how gorgeous it was. And Lynch’s dune was also good-looking. Hpwever Villeneuves dune is going to be, lets hope it’s also beautiful. Theres something in the book or the legend (the aura of the book) that inspires artists.
Yes! These two are in my DVD collection; Children of Dune in particular is so well done. I love this interpretation of Alia.
I am ashamed to admit that I still have not read Dune or any of its sequels, but I very much enjoyed the mini-series as well as the Children of Dune mini-series. It’s been years since I’ve rewatched them, and I think it’s time I did. I have a hard time imagining any one film doing either story justice in a future adaption, but I also can’t see a multi-film adaptation (a la Lord of the Rings) being very satisfactory. Perhaps a big-budget television adaptation is the best way to go in this case, but I can’t say which network would do the best job.
This was actually the first home video I purchased on DVD (still a new medium in the year 2000), and which I happened to rewatch a few months ago, prompted by the Dune Re-Read series here on Tor.com.
At the time there was a review of the miniseries on Space.com, which considered the theatrical-style staging and lighting of some scenes (could the moonlight be any more green?) and Baron Harkonnen’s couplets, and proposed that the next adaptation should be an opera.
My observations and IMHOs: Every scene in Giedi Prime was shot askew. The heighliners, sandworms and tiny hunter-killer are overdesigned; the lift-fans in the CGI and practical ornithopters don’t match, and in some CGI shots are missing altogether. The Fremen costumes involve too much leather — where would they get it? Spice-plastic (whatever that is) seems a more likely material. Similarly, there were cook-fires on sticks. The Fremen aesthetics overall seem excessively stone-age middle eastern — they’re living in a desert, but they’ve got future tech; no reason to have ragged edges on their clothing. The protective hand-gestures made by the Guild representatives merely look eccentric.
A few things seem to be inherited from the Lynch movie rather than the novel: The attention lavished on the heighliners and the mutated Guild Navigator.
Completely agree that switching Irulan from backward-looking narrator to active participant really was a critical deviation from the book that allowed this visual adaptation to work well. I recall noting the change but almost immediately thinking “nope, not a problem, it flows better onscreen this way” (as I did for the Henneth Annûn -> Osgiliath change in Jackson’s The Two Towers, and a few other movies/shows since then). It’s good to see when a filmmaker recognizes that the important thing is neither his vision nor the novelist’s, but rather what best conveys the story to the viewing audience—as long as the change does no violence to the truly important story and thematic elements.
@1/Jason_UmmaMacabre & @7/shiznatikus: I think the technology and economics of TV and film production have reached the point where every novel/series of any significant complexity should be adapted for TV rather than feature films; I believe that even some of the recent successful feature-film adaptations (Harry Potter, The Hunger Games, LotR) would be improved upon if re-done as TV series—especially if the producers are willing to vary episode lengths a bit to match content. The pacing expectations of TV shows just seem to allow for a bit more exploration of story and character subtleties that can make books such a rich experience. This adaptation of Dune may not be the bestest thing in the history of ever, but I do think it may mark a turning point where TV surpassed film as the better medium for this type of SFF adaptation; shows like BSG and Game of Thrones have only upped the ante since then.
I need to watch this again. I don’t remember being impressed at the time. Syfy had also done perhaps the worst adaption of all time in Ursula LeGuin’s A Wizard of Earthsea.
Julie Cox is such a revelation as Irulan. I just love her expanded role in the miniseries. Along with her costumes and wardrobe designs.
Also the music in the 2nd ep where the Plotters are being executed is just haunting.
… while an occasional sound stage effect is discernible from not shooting the desert scenes outdoors
You mean the way the lighting completely failed to match? To my eyes, that stuck out like a sore thumb.
(I did see a making-of discussion on the DVD where it was mentioned that the cinematographer was really keen on using extra colored lighting to enhance the “mood” of some of the scenes. So it’s possible the blatantly inconsistent lighting was supposed to be a feature.)
The costumes and sets are gorgeously appointed and so shrewdly thought through
Well, de gustibus, etc. One of the few things I remember about the series was the bizarre costuming and (especially) the hats. Dear god, the hats.
The fight choreography positively sparkles in all the places where it counts.
Really? I actually thought the fight scenes were rather awkward and poorly staged; I remember being impressed at how bad some of it was.
Phillip Thorne @8:
The protective hand-gestures made by the Guild representatives merely look eccentric.
Oh, lord, I can still remember those. Very silly.
Got to disagree emphatically on the costumes. Seriously? In ten thousand years we will all wear funny hats? But some of Irulan’s gowns are quite lovely.
As I recall, the statue waterfall was just Chani and Jessica pouring our water to make it LOOK like Paul was doing it – it was an act. Playing up the religious angle. Maybe that was cut for time in version you remember.
The pacing issue that I recall (from such a long time ago) was the mini-series’s desire to stick close to the novel and therefore to include lots of psychedelia to represent Paul’s explorations of “inner space” and Time and Destiny and such. I think it worked on the page much better than (languidly) on the screen.
And thank you, Ms. Asher-Perrin, for saying something that I have thought for that same long time: Children of Dune is better. For the life of me, I still do not know why, so I look forward to the re-read and then the re-watch.
I absolutely agree. In fairness this was my first real introduction to the world, but I’ve now rewatched it and the followup several times. Not having read the books, I was immediately grabbed by the Bene Gesserit, and then surprisingly, by Irulan. My greatest disappointment with the Lynch version (and it turns out the books since this was a miniseries choice) was how little Irulan had to do with the story. But something about her portrayal here (and even more so in Children of Dune) was especially compelling to me. It is a shame they had to recast some actors for the followup, for as much as I like the Borg Queen, Saskia Reeves is the only Lady Jessica I can truly accept.
The glowy blue eyes always annoyed me.
Most perfect headline I’ve read anywhere in years! Sums it up perfectly, though the article does a great job expanding on it. And I agree, Children is an improvement, no doubt. :)
Children was better primarily because both the Story and the acting was better… Also, it took to novels instead of one, and the adaptation was exactly that. An adaptation. They cut stuff out. Made for a better miniseries.
Also, the production values were higher. And James McAvoy was fantastic, as always.
@18, It is kind of damming with faint praise isn’t it?
I fully agree that it is the superior adaptation… mainly because it wants to be an adaptation and not an excercize in “I-don’t-give-a-damn-about-the-source-material”. I also agree that the design, in general, speaks of a crew that has respect and attachment to the original material. The costumes, in particular, bring to mind visual creator like Moebius to mind. I personally dissagree deeply with all those who have mentioned their mocking of the “funny” hats as non-futuritic. Have you even browsed through the history of fashion here on earth? If you consider Dune happens in a period of decadence (in many senses) and ecesses, it is just expectable to see garments of that ostetatious nature everywhere. Also, remember that many characters, if not most of them, belong to upper classes utterly disconected to the “real” everyday life of the universe. This is a deeply divided cast-system universe that resembles the middle ages much more than the “future”.
Now, where the series fails, and does so in a big way, is in its portrayal of Arrakis… You mention the “gorgeous” mate paintings, but nope… they are not mate paintings (just basically theatrical background curtains) and they are poor. They, combined with the fake-as-heck lighting, demolish all the scope the planet and its dessert needed in order to be a character itself. That, curiously, is one of the few design choices that were critical, but were underdevelloped. I guess we can blame budget for that, but even so, it was a poor choice in resource allocation.
The other weird choice, and one that you curiously fail to mention since it was something that I remember popping up in the interviews during the promotional stage of the show back in the day, is to avoid every and all internal voices. The book, as the director of the series mentioned, has a lot of internal monologues which translate poorly into an audiovisual medium like TV. His choice was to go without them. In principle there’s nothing wrong with that… it’s the sensible choice. The problem is that his directing and the way the dialogue was written did not make up for what is lost in translation. That’s probably why the pace seems so odd at times. Here the creators went with a blunt show-don’t-tell approach that destroyed most of the important subtleness of the original text. Nowadays, in a post Game-of-Thrones world, that would be unaceptable. If you forfiet internal monologues form a monologue-heavy book, you HAVE to push your dialogue game to its best (like GoT does in it’s better moments). In Dune… well… it just tends to feel like its dessert: cheap.
Nevertheless I really like it (but still would have hoped for those things to be better).
I enjoyed the TV version but after being so disappointed in the movie it would be hard not to. I can’t think of another movie I was so ashamed to have paid to see.in a theater. There have been worse movies but I am hard pressed to think of any that was a greater affront to the source material.
I watched the miniseries for the first time this week and I have to say it was awesome!
They may have had a small budget, but my God, the sets for the scenes set within the palaces were magnificent. The designs for the desert landscape, the sietches, the town of Arrakeen and the spaceships were similarly well-done. It definitely gave me a sense of being in the Duniverse! I also appreciated the attention paid to the costuming (and the colour-coding of all the major groups that viewers needed to remember), such as of the Fremen, the Sardaukar and the Harkonnens; however some of choices they went with were a bit… interesting at times (looking at you, Irulan’s increasingly elaborate hats).
It was definitely a wise move to expand Irulan’s character. Julie Cox played her character superbly, and almost made me forget that the princess had such a limited role in the novel. Her presence made her very sympathetic in the miniseries, making the fact that she was locked in a loveless marriage with Paul all the more heartbreaking in her case. Barbora Kodetova and Saskia Reeves also need special mentions for their acting in this show. Now, whenever I think of Dune, the novel’s Chani and Jessica highly resemble. Although, it must be said that at times, Alec Newman’s and some others’ acting was a bit off, but nothing too egregious.
On the whole, the miniseries did pretty well adapting the novel. There are much more aspects I liked but I’ll add all of them here or this comment will be even huger than as is. There were some problems, of course; the drawback of following the source material so closely is that it may mess up the pacing – the miniseries was quite slow at times. The choice of not going with narration or overt exposition was odd: I felt that not enough was explained to get a comprehensive view of the Duniverse. The CGI was a bit faulty at times but I guess that can be excused for due to budgetary contraints. Nevertheless, Frank Herbert’s Dune was far more that “OK”, maybe even excellent, especially in the light of Lynch’s fiasco and Jodorowsky’s aborted monstrosity.
I have watched this numerous times. Despite its imperfections, it has the some of the same kind of strength George Lucas gave the early Star Wars; it has the ability to take you to another place, which the elements combine to move you that has dangers but is beautiful at the same time. It also has that inspirational quality that reminds us that we abilities that we fail to use.
Can you watch this on any of the streaming services, apple channels, buy it on itunes, etc.? I’ve looked for it for years, but I don’t want to pay $80 for a dvd.
No. No no no no no no. Ick.
The TV mini series was one of the worst things I’ve ever attempted watching. The books are a treasure, the movie is kind of fun but kind of bad… The miniseries is a travesty. I can’t understand why anyone would praise this corny jibberish.
..
The books are dense and confusing. The movie is just confusing if visually stunning. The miniseries makes a fairly successful stab at being comprehensible which some of us appreciate. The hats not so much.
I hated most of the costumes for distracting from the story. And the weird accents. The blue eyes were too blue and looked like cheap CGI.
But the big problem with the original movie, the tv miniseries, and no doubt with the new Denis Villeneuve version is the casting of the main character as someone older than he is in the novel. This was also the single largest mistake in the adaptation of Ender’s Game. In Dune, Paul Atreides is fifteen as the story begins, and eighteen when it concludes. In those three years he transforms physically, psychologically, spiritually, in every way possible. To make him an adult (Timothee Chalamet is a fine actor but he’s an adult!) is to condense those three years, just as they condensed Ender’s years at Battle School so it only seemed like a few months. All of Paul’s accomplishments, his journey, will seem less extraordinary if he’s already grown up when the story begins.
The only way to film Dune and maintain the integrity of the main character’s profound transformation is to cast an actor who’s fifteen and film the first half, then wait three years before filming the second half. Richard Linklater did it with Boyhood. We’ve had 2 failures with Dune so far. Why make another version without addressing how the first two failed?
@29/D.Joseph,
I agree. I am sure that there are 15 year olds out there who are potentially fine actors and who are appropriate to the role.
The David Lynch movie shows what happens if you don’t at least give that a try. Instead of having a youth with a powerful sense of presence, who “spoke and acted like a man”, you have a 20 something actor acting boyish in order to try to look 15.
I have the dvds and will watch again soon; odd it is not available via iTunes.
Also recommend the audiobooks (w Simon Vance et al); a great way to revisit the books.