The tiniest Stephen King book, both in page count and substance, The Colorado Kid came along after King disgorged three of his massive Dark Tower novels. Arriving in early 2005, three years after his last non-series novel, From a Buick 8, it could easily be considered a coda to Buick. Clocking in at a slim 184 pages, set in two locations (a restaurant and a newspaper office), and with only three characters, this is as skinny as King gets.
At this point in his career, King’s line-by-line writing is so polished that he can pull off pretty much anything, from a big fat fantasy series to DVR set-up instructions, with panache. But his one-a-year publishing habit was firmly established by 2005 when this book came out and that’s got pros and cons. As he said around the time of Buick, “I can’t imagine retiring from writing. What I can imagine doing is retiring from publishing…If I wrote something that I thought was worth publishing I would publish it. But in terms of publishing stuff on a yearly basis the way I have been, I think those days are pretty much over…From a Buick 8…so far as I know [is] the last Stephen King novel, per se, in terms of it just being a novel-novel.”
With Colorado Kid he proved himself wrong.
Kid started as a blurb request. Charles Ardai founded his Hard Case Crime imprint to reprint lost hardboiled novels and contemporary books that fit that mold. When he launched his line he wanted to get a blurb from King because why wouldn’t anyone, so he approached King through his accountant, hoping that coming from an unexpected direction might yield results. Five months later, King’s literary agent called and told him that King wouldn’t be providing him with a blurb, he’d be writing him a novel. Ardai, as any publisher would, immediately went out and drank five billion bottles of champagne. He commissioned a beautiful cover painting from Glen Orbik and, as expected, King’s Kid became the line’s best-selling novel and gave the imprint a huge publicity injection. Especially after it later became the basis for the Syfy series, Haven, which ran for five seasons.
The story is set on Moose-Lookit Island, a fictitious nugget of land off the coast Maine, like the location of Dolores Claiborne, or the island in “The Reach” from Skeleton Crew, or “Home Delivery” from Nightmares and Dreamscapes. The first chapter starts in a restaurant with newspapermen Vince Teague and Dave Bowie shocking their intern, Stephanie McCann, by stealing the cash a Boston Globe writer left behind for the bill before bouncing back to the mainland. Teague is 90, the founder of The Weekly Islander, and Bowie is either an androgynous, multi-faceted pop star or the 65-year-old managing editor of that same paper. They’re the kind of King characters who say things like “ayuh” and “Oh gorry.” Turns out the cash-swiping is a test for Stephanie’s powers of deduction, and the two old timers lead her down a path that ends with the realization that they’re playing a shell game with the cash so they can give even more of it to the waitress, tax free.
After that, they go back to the offices of The Weekly Islander and talk. That’s it. I’m serious. There is no more. Like My Dinner with Andre, the entire meat of this story is one conversation. That’s probably going to be a jumping off point for a lot of people, and that’s okay. While his book-a-year habit means that some years he’s going to spread his jam thick, some years he’s going to spread it pretty damn thin, like Kid, which feels like little more than a sketch on the back of a napkin. But that’s okay, because King’s one-a-year habit reassures us that if you don’t like this book, another one will be coming along soon enough.
What brought the writer for the Boston Globe to Moose-Lookit Island was a quest for stories of unexplained mysteries that might look good in the Sunday supplement. Bowie and Teague obligingly trotted out a couple of campfire chestnuts for him, but now that they’re back at the office, Stephanie wants to know if they’ve ever actually stumbled across a real unexplained mystery, so they tell her about The Colorado Kid.
See, back in 1980, two local kids found the body of a man dressed in a suit, sitting on the beach, dead. Cause of death turns out to be asphyxiation: he choked to death on a piece of meat. Where the meat came from and where it went, how and when he had a fish dinner, and even a loose Russian coin rattling around in his pockets all turn out to be clues that lead down spiraling paths of conjecture that end nowhere. The only real break comes when a trainee coroner identifies the tax stamp on the Colorado Kid’s pack of cigarettes as being from Colorado, a breakthrough that yields an ID for the corpse after months of work.
But that leads to the biggest complication of all. Because based on the Kid’s movements and when he was last seen in Colorado, there’s no way he could have made it all the way to Maine in the time he had. Theories are floated—he chartered a private plane, UFO abduction, people are lying—but they all sink, one after the other and 25 years later, the mystery still stands. The book ends with Stephanie wondering at the mystery, and isn’t life full of mysteries that are so much more beguiling than their solutions. Cue state of wonderment, life is stories, we are all made of starstuff, etc. Kid is partially about two strangers from out west (the Colorado Kid and Stephanie) who come to Moose-Lookit Island and get adopted by the locals, but, like From a Buick 8, it’s also about how mysteries are sometimes more compelling than their solutions.
It’s considered common knowledge that on some level fiction should aspire to reproduce reality. But fiction writers inevitably hit a moment in their careers when they realize that to replicate real life too closely is to bore the pants off their readers. Fiction requires motives, drama, resolutions, and compelling endings, all tendencies that real life resists. The first time fiction writers realize this is when they try to reproduce human speech and discover that if they do it too faithfully they just wind up with gibberish on the page. Later, that writer will discover the same is true for plots and characters. Kid and From a Buick 8 feel like King’s protests against the unreality of fiction, about how the needs of drama sometimes flatten the mysterious, beautiful, unknowingness of life.
The problem with Kid as opposed to Buick is that Buick is about a dead father and his son trying to discover what happened to him, while Kid is about a girl from away deciding to go fulltime with her summer internship because she loves Maine so much. One is a bit more emotionally compelling than the other.
From a Buick 8 brought one part of King’s career to an end. He had just recovered from being hit by a van, and so that book is suffused with pain and a sense that the world has ended. Kid is the first faint stirrings among the grave dirt, the twitching fingers that indicate the victim may not be dead yet. It’s a five fingered exercise, a little noodle on the piano keys to warm up his fingers, before King brings the world to an end—again, but this time for fun—in his next novel, Cell.
Grady Hendrix has written for publications ranging from Playboy to World Literature Today; his previous novel was Horrorstör, about a haunted IKEA, and his latest novel, My Best Friend’s Exorcism, is basically Beaches meets The Exorcist.
I reread The Colorado Kid a few weeks ago and I enjoyed it the second time through even more than the first. It’s true that not much happens and that the wrap-up isn’t as great as it could have been but it’s still a nice little reflection on stories and our need for closure. Thanks for the article and this good series.
Apparently King got his inspiration for the story from a real-life case in Australia in the 1940s. A well-dressed European man was found sitting on a beach in Sydney with no ID. (IIRC, there was some weirdness about the food he’d been eating as well.) No one matching his description was reported missing and he was never identified.
(I tried to find out more details about the real-life case via Google, because I remember reading articles about it when the book originally came out. Unfortunately right now every search I do just brings me to stuff about “Haven.” A blog called “Angie’s Diary” briefly summarizes the original case.)
King has said that there is a “clue” to the mystery in the fact that while in Colorado the man stops at a Starbucks at a location where no Starbucks existed at the time. Grady, I know you haven’t really gotten into King’s “Dark Tower” series, but that clue has led a lot of readers to conjecture that the man came from some other reality/level of the Tower. Maybe he went “todash?”
I found this readable but think it’s very far from King’s best work. It’s also a nice illustration of a line King frequently references, “The column of truth has a hole in it” (this is a paraphrase of a poem by George Seferis)
Ha ha – found it! :) I hate recommending Wikipedia, but they have a very comprehensive discussion of the case with numerous outside references. Search for “Tamam Shud case” on Wikipedia.
If you do a Google search you’ll also find an excellent “Smithsonian Magazine” article, with a lot of interesting comments from people who are knowledgeable about the case, which is apparently still unsolved.
“The Colorado Kid” is basically a retelling of the Taman Shud case. I now remember being a little disappointed when I found this out. While King has an incredible imagination, it appears he pretty much just “lifted” the mystery in “The Colorado Kid” from this real-life mystery and transported it to Maine
I love this one for all the reasons I couldn’t love From A Buick 8.
To me, the big problem with Buick was that King couldn’t just settle for creating this atmospheric enigma, he had to solve it for the reader, and this posed several problems. One being that solutions are frequently less-satisfying than puzzles (though this isn’t always the case, obviously), and another being that the solution in Buick 8, even if you liked it, was well beyond what the cast of characters in the book could ever be expected to figure out with the way they were established.
This is a frequent problem with King. He’s one of my favorite writers, but there’s a reason I think he’s a better short story writer than novelist, and it’s that he has trouble sticking landings. He’s absolutely brilliant at characters and concepts. but if he has to tie it all up…. And short stories don’t have to tie things up so much, especially horror stories; you can just end at the cliff’s edge or with the pregnant implication or simply leave a character pumping gas until he dies, and it pretty much works.
(Egads, Cell is next, and a terrible example of this. Solid for 2/3 of the way through, maybe more, and then for some reason he decides to give it an ending that South Park had parodied many years before the book was published. Not a good landing, Steve. Not good at all.)
(To be clear, I still want to be Stephen King when I grow up, if it’s not too late for that (I’m in my forties: it’s probably too late for that.)
California Kid was a book where he was okay with throwing it all out there, the concept and the cast and the atmosphere with no beginning and no ending, and it works for me. It works so well, I can think of other novels he might have tried the same trick with and they would have been better for it. Kid is like getting a perfect little Stephen King cookie, all the best stuff and you want more of it but are grateful there isn’t any; not half-baked, not burnt to a crisp, not too sweet, not too savory. I won’t say it’s my all-time favorite King novel, but I do think it’s his Goldilocks book. He hit just the spot. Right there. Perfectly.
@@@@@ 3 jaimew:
There was quite a good article on the Tamam Shud case in The Fortean Times two or three months ago. Unfortunately FT no longer publishes on line, but you can see the cover of the relevant issue here.
@Raskos – Thanks; I’d already seen that Wikipedia article. Despite the fact that I *stink* at any kind of code-breaking, I still kind of want to try my hand at breaking the code in the “Rubaiyat!”
A lot of what I’ve read about the case seems to suggest that the “Somerton Man” was a Cold War spy or even potentially a double agent, although the mystery may never be solved. As I said, I was kind of disappointed that King pretty much lifted the entire case for “The Colorado Kid.” Maybe he was fascinated with the original case and wanted to introduce a larger audience to it, but if so, I wish he’d been more transparent about his motive
But, what about the mystery? King gives so many tantalizing hints for anyone who reads mysteries and is used to spotting the red flags of Something Suspicious. Then, there are the things that King fans should know are suspicious.
The big one: Randall Flagg is in this book! He establishes critical elements of the timeline!
The only person who saw Cogan, the dead man, come to work that day, was George “Rankin or Franklin.” The newspaper guys can’t remember which, but I can’t be the only one who alarm bells going off. The secretary at the office says she must have stepped away from the desk–but she doesn’t specifically remember stepping away. All we know is that she didn’t see Cogan come in.
The hints in the story seem to be that Cogan came to Maine to stop something Flagg set in motion and that he was involved with the two murdered bodies burned in the fire the night he died. Likely, he’s the one who killed them, and they smoked the two cigarettes (lit with one match) missing from the box of cigarettes he bought.
I like mystery novels, and one without an answer is going to keep me thinking about it. So, I’ve probably over-analyzed this one. I’ll refrain from posting everything, but let me get some highlights.
James Cogan has a lot of Christ imagery tied to him, underscoring the idea that he somehow gave his life protecting the town from . . . something.
There are interesting hints about the finding of the body. One of the two who found it was the girlfriend (possibly pregnant) of a politically ambitious man who disappeared. No one seems to quite remember how or when she left or where she went. The politically ambitious man was the other one who found the body. He said it was the girlfriend’s fault the body was moved but admitted he was the one who actually did it.
There are references to The Call of Cthulhu and to Cat Stevens’ Tea for the Tillerman and Father and Son. The song, Hernando’s Hideaway is used to suggest a happily married couple’s love nest, but the song is actually about going somewhere no one will recognize you. I don’t know if that’s just a touch of humor or something deeper.
And the Russian coin, from what I read, was a type no longer in production in the USSR, but commemorative ones had been made for the Olympics held in 1980, the year the murder happened. It was also the year (in our world, which this may not be) that the US didn’t go the Olympics.
OK, stopping now.
@@@@@ 6 jaimew –
my apologies, this is the link that I meant to send you – some forteans discussing the Tamam Shud case.
Whoa – that’s some extensive analysis and I’m really happy to read it. You know, I try to avoid going too far under the ice with King because I know that’s where a lot of his Dark Tower stuff linking up a lot of his books and creating a “Steve-o-Verse” exists. But it sounds like I’ll have to read the Dark Tower series after I finish this big re-read. I’ve only ever read the first one and had no interest in the rest, but I need to give it a shot.
By the way – what’s the CELL/SOUTH PARK connection? I haven’t come across this.
@Raskos: Thanks for the updated link! :)
@GradyHendrix: Did you read the original or the updated (ret-conned) version of “The Gunslinger?” I first read and liked the original, but it has a very different tone than most of King’s other stuff. He wrote it when he was 19 and since then he’s admitted that it had a “college student writer’s workshop” feel to it. I personally adore the “Dark Tower” saga but YYMV.
I personallly think “Cell” is a lot of fun. It’s far from King’ most profound work but I found it an enjoyable read. It reminds me of George Romero’s cheesiest zombie movies, which is pretty apropos given his recent death! (There are also a couple of direct Romero references in “Cell” – people more familiar with Romero’s work than I will probably be able to point out all of them.)
I don’t get the “South Park”/”Cell” connexion either. @ellynne, please explain in the next post! I was really into “South Park” for a while and I’m racking my brain to think of which episode you are referencing. It’s not the one about homeless people taking over South Park, is it?
I was the one who mentioned the South Park / Cell thing.
Way back in the early years of the show, they did a Halloween special titled, “Pinkeye,” in which an unlikely chain of events involving Kenny, the Mir space station, and an embalming accident with Worcestershire sauce leads to a zombie outbreak. The kids eventually get through on the telephone to a Worcestershire sauce customer service rep who helpfully tells them the cure for zombie and adds that she hopes they haven’t been indiscriminately killing every zombie they see.
Of course, by this point in the story, they’ve been indiscriminately killing every zombie they see.
While there’s no Worcestershire sauce in King’s novel, the parallel is… unfortunate, in my eyes. Kind of killed the book for me. YMMV.
@eric: Sorry for username confusion! I think I somehow missed that episode of “South Park.” I will have to look it up.
@jaimew No problem! And it’s worth tracking that one down if you can find it–it’s pretty damned funny, as their Halloween specials so often were (and perhaps still are–I don’t get to see the show very much anymore).
You hit it on the head early on with your mention that King could write appliance documentation (I guess he has graduated from grocery lists) and still be worth reading.
This book is effectively a noodle. You can see King playing with the ideas of hard-boiled fiction (though the novel is anything but), and mystery (though it’s only half a mystery) but never to any real point. Of course his usual appealing characters pull us through. The stakes being less portentous than usual (nobody’s trying to Divert the Beams or whatever) make the whole thing refreshing in a way that’s unusual for late-period King. Dare I call a King book breezy?
The unsolved mystery was the biggest sticking point in discussions on this book elsewhere. I think it’s the weakest idea of the book — I don’t have a problem with loose ends not being tidied up but if you deliberately structure a story as a mystery, with clues and red herrings, you have an implicit contract that there is a solution, whether stated or unstated. King pulls a Damien Lindelof here and sprinkles out a bunch of intriguing puzzle pieces that add up to nothing. Even the non-solution feels more lazy than profound or evocative.
I found it worth the time despite that (though many readers, even King fans, don’t), going back to the strengths mentioned above.
And, oh, that cover painting and design. Worth the price for that alone.
This is one of my all time King favorites, and, IMO, one of his best works. I love the ambiguity, the realism, the speculation, and the dangling questions. I listened to the audiobook when the book came out, and the performance was brilliant, enhancing the content with the feel of a couple of old journalists both relaxing together and trying to impress a newbie. I agree with Eric (post#4) that King’s short fiction is better than his longer novels–he usually seems to lose interest at some point, and wrap things up too conveniently. Eric articulated my other opinions perfectly. A couple of other posters feel that the story is a bit of a cheat, but not wrapping things up makes it real