Two questions for you today, lovely readers of Tor.com: (1) How fast do you read? (2) Why?
I have a lot of friends who read. In some circles, I am the slowest reader, slotting 50-55 books per year while my comrades knock out 75-100 (which is wild!). In other circles, I’m the biggest reader, the guy who’s always recommending books to everyone else.
Across all of my social circles, there’s obviously a diversity of reading speeds. As readers, we all go through the ebb and flow. One month the stars will align and I’ll zip through five beefy epic fantasies. Another month, I might trudge through two books, distracted by other hobbies or responsibilities. The only person I know who never wavers in his reading is my friend Andrew, who somehow manages raising a child, running two D&D campaigns, and reading 100+ books per year. He is a monster.
Many conversations with reader friends of all sorts include at least a brief aside about their reading speed: “I’m a really slow reader,” insists one friend with whom I talk about books quite a bit. Now, when someone says they’re a slow reader, it generally means one of two things (or some combination thereof): (1) They’re slow at the actual act of reading, in the sense that their words per minute count is low, or (2) They don’t read that often, only picking their current book up sporadically for one reason or another. Both viable explanations for what it means to be a “slow” reader.
On the other hand, I almost never hear someone say they’re a “fast” reader. Sure, “I read a lot” kinda counts. And it gets us to the same place. As someone who considers themselves a “fast” reader, I’ve lately begun to wonder: what makes me read a book faster, and when do I take my sweet time?
I gave it some thought, and the answer surprised me: mediocrity. Middle-of-the-road books almost always become my fastest reads, and I’ve started to understand why.
Now, to be clear, I’m not going to call out any mediocre books directly. That’s far too subjective. Instead, I hope you read this and think about what influences your reading speed, whether it’s mediocrity, greatness, or some other intangible essence.
Two recent books spring to mind. One is an eARC of a highly anticipated release from a popular writer. Another is a novel by a newer author I’ve read before and wanted to support.
I started the eARC wide-eyed and ready for a return to form from the author whose work I’ve adored for years. Almost immediately, I could tell it wasn’t quite the book for me. It was fine…good, even, but it didn’t have the same raw, emotional magnetism of the other works I’ve read. My feelings solidified the further I read, and I found myself sneaking precious minutes between writing assignments to knock out a chapter or two. My wife was getting ready for a party; I was all geared up and ready to go, so I snagged my Kindle and popped through a few pages. Normally, I’d never dream of such a quick reading session. I prefer reading in big chunks, or at least by the chapter. As I read, though, I realized I was reading to reach the end, not to enjoy the story I had longed for.
[Quick aside: this probably begs the question—Cole, why don’t you just go the DNF route and pick up a book you want to read? I’m not interested in getting into a DNF or no debate. I finish most of the books I read because I write reviews of them for The Quill To Live, even if they weren’t my favorites! I also enjoy finishing books I’m not crazy about because they offer interesting lessons for writers. Anyhoo…]
Sneaking these quick moments with a mediocre book helped me cruise right through to the ending, which was admittedly heartwarming even though the journey to it wasn’t all I’d pined for.
I finished the book, then moved on to greener pastures. I took my time with those, reveling in the familiar fantasy worlds of series I’ve been enjoying for some time.
And then came an unexpected read. One I hadn’t put in my year-long reading schedule (which, surprisingly, I’ve stuck to quite well this year). I was ahead of schedule and this ~250-pager fell into my lap, a forgotten pre-order from months ago. I hopped on the treadmill and started reading it during my daily two-mile walk.
Hoo boy, was this book a disappointment for me. I knew within 30 pages I wouldn’t like it, and the feeling continued as I hit the halfway point after finishing my walk. The next day, I picked it up once more, completing the novel in one marathon session.
Soon I started pondering this trend once more. I read books I find middling or mediocre faster than anything else. Bad books are a slog, and I tend to cherish my time with good ones, carefully reading every page so I don’t miss a detail. However, one crucial factor surfaced as I perused my recent reading list and identified the books I’d considered mediocre: length.
Most of the books I read quickly were in the 250-400 page range. A respectable page count, and I am by no means saying longer books are inherently better than short ones. Shorter books—“short” here meaning anything that isn’t a 500+ page epic SFF novel—are naturally quicker reads than their meaty counterparts. That’s just math. So when I start a book and realize part way through that I’m not feeling it, the incentive to finish (I’ll be able to write a review and add it to my annual count) remains even if I won’t emerge from the experience thrilled with or by the story. It’s short. Why not invest a bit more time to knock it out and seek a better book for my next read?
I realize, of course, there’s nothing stopping me from dropping mediocre books the moment I realize they aren’t clicking. But I also find that I enjoy this delicate dance I have with books I neither love nor hate.
No grand conclusion or unifying self-discovery today, reader—just a guy ruminating on the speed at which he reads meh books. Though I would like to know what you think, and how you’d answer my initial questions: how fast do you read, and why?
Cole Rush writes words. A lot of them. For the most part, you can find those words at The Quill To Live or on Twitter @ColeRush1. He voraciously reads epic fantasy and science-fiction, seeking out stories of gargantuan proportions and devouring them with a bookwormish fervor. His favorite books are: The Divine Cities Series by Robert Jackson Bennett, The Long Way To A Small, Angry Planet by Becky Chambers, and The House in the Cerulean Sea by TJ Klune.
I am a very fast reader, at least according to all the sluggards around me who only need to bring one or two books with them on an airplane. If it’s an exciting book I read even faster. I can’t help myself, even at the expense of reading comprehension; I just need to see what’s going to happen next.
I’m the same, really. Although I have no qualms about tossing a book on the DNF pile, sometimes I just want to finish it, even if I’m not enjoying it. Because it’s a classic, or because of raving reviews.
It’s not a big deal, someone has to hold the dissent opinion, right? But when that happens, the “speed-reading” mode kicks in, and I’m done with it ASAP.
If it’s something that blows my mind, and I’m enjoying it greatly, I’ll try to savor, and make it last as much as possible.
I was an English major who specialized in Victorian and American novels of the 19th Century so massive tomes I had to read fast. My speed and comprehension have remained many years after. I read a 350 page historical mystery last night in just over two hours. The straightforward popular genre novels are much faster reads for me than the world building and emotionally complex ones. Unless the book is such a train wreck that I can’t look away, I usually toss the mediocre ones within a few chapters. Life is too short to spend with bad books.
I have only started to DNF in the last year. It’s very liberating, I have even created a Goodreads shelf to log them so in the future I know what they were. I am aware in some cases it is me not the book and the right frame of mind would change my perceptions of the story.
I read fast, both in word count and in the number of books.
The books I have read the fastest have mostly been fantasy tomes like Oathbringer or Inheritance. I read a little over 900 pages of Oathbringer in one day.
I also read very fluffy or light books quickly (in January last year I read half a dozen Daisy Dalrymple mysteries in about 9 days).
I have made myself finish a couple of books I hated (The Ambassadors and Worlds of Arthur) because I had already put a lot of effort into reading them, but I don’t generally keep reading something if I don’t like it.
It is interesting that disliking a book makes you read faster, Cole! It generally slows me down.
I have two reasons I read with intention — great character and world development and/or wonderful prose. The best authors do both. I read quickly when I’ve grown bored of the story and just want to know how it ends. I am hesitant to add a book to the DNF pile. Sometimes it’s the book and sometimes it’s me.
I’m currently setting myself a quota of 60 novels and novellas per year, but the other 70% of what I’m reading is non-fiction, and a lot of that is very image-heavy books about aircraft, cars, art, etc. I’m also perfectly willing to apply grad-school reading strategies to fiction that I would to an academic monograph; read the first 50 pages and then skip to the end, then skimming the middle.
I kinda waffle between both. I’ve devoured books in a span of a week because I got so enraptured with them that I needed to find out what happened next, and I’ve slogged through books that gave me no motivation to pick up again out of a sense of obligation. But there’s also been times when I slowed down to just savor a book and study the prose of it, and times when I’ve literally marathoned books just to be done with them.
I think what makes the difference is the writing style. Books I’ve devoured fast tend to be snappy and dialogue-driven, whereas books that I’ve taken my time with have been more detail-oriented and ideas-heavy.
See, I’m a slow-as-molasses reader. This is both in terms of finding time to read and actual reading speed. I used to pace back in forth in my dorm rooms for hours forcing my way through readings that took my friends maybe forty minutes? I think my lack of speed is one of the reasons why I’m so fond of audiobooks as an adult.
I’m just learning to skim and skip around and even DNF. The problem is that most of my very favorite books were things I struggled to get into the first time or two, then came back to later. There’s always that chance that DNFing something for good could mean missing out on my next obsession and that haunts me a bit.
But also, the beauty of audio is that you can double speed your hate or obligation reads. I wish I could do that with print or ebooks.