If you’ve been avoiding the discourse over on superhero Twitter lately (which I understand and applaud you for), you may have missed the latest dust up around a cut scene in the upcoming third season of the Harley Quinn animated series, and the resultant resurfacing of the age-old question: Do heroes do that?
And before we get bogged down in colorful euphemisms: Yes, we’re talking about sex.
The reason this particular thought is being brought back into the spotlight again is all due to a quote from Harley Quinn co-creator Justin Halpern in a Variety article about superhero TV and how its latest hits (WandaVision and Umbrella Academy included) subvert their own genre. When asked about how writing Harley Quinn was different from other superhero narratives, Halpern pointed out that working with villains gives them a freedom that doesn’t exist elsewhere, highlighting a place in their third season where said leeway suddenly dried up:
“[…] we had a moment where Batman was going down on Catwoman. And DC was like, ‘You can’t do that. You absolutely cannot do that.’ They’re like, ‘Heroes don’t do that.’ So, we said, ‘Are you saying heroes are just selfish lovers?’ They were like, ‘No, it’s that we sell consumer toys for heroes. It’s hard to sell a toy if Batman is also going down on someone.’”
It’s important to note that this isn’t the first time this issue has been raised when it comes to the toy-selling set (as DC would apparently put it). A couple years back, while various film auteurs where having a field day making fun of the superhero genre and its brainless dominance over box office, Spanish filmmaker Pedro Almodóvar told Vulture that he had a different beef with them entirely: “There are many, many movies about superheroes. And sexuality doesn’t exist for superheroes. They are neutered.”
Thing is, he’s got a point. Superheroes are often wildly attractive people in peak physical condition, who never seem to get laid. Or… maybe it’s a bit more sinister than that. Maybe the point is that they can never get laid while they’re busy being super. Note what Halpern said above: “Batman was going down on Catwoman.” If the same scene had existed with Bruce Wayne and Selina Kyle, their daytime alter egos, would DC have cared? You know what’s weird? They probably wouldn’t.
More often than not, the only times we see evidence of superheroes engaging in sexy activities (and no, I’m not talking about banter or walking around shirtless) on film is when they’re not on “active duty” as it were. They’re on a break from being a hero, a hiatus, or maybe it’s well before they gained their super status. It’s possible that things are happening off camera, sure, but the clear suggestion of sexual activity rarely comes up. And while superhero films are typically aimed at families, that’s still an odd omission to come across time and again, particularly when there seem to be unwritten rules of engagement—and toy sales—around the subject.
There are some exceptions, of course. We get the impression that Clark Kent and Lois Lane have a sex life of sorts in Batman v Superman. Then Superman dies at the end of the film. When Batman is pulling his playboy shtick as Bruce Wayne, that gives him some wiggle room? He does definitely sleep with Vikki Vale in Batman—who doesn’t make it to the sequel. Then the Nolan version of Wayne sleeps with a woman who turns out to be Talia al Ghul in The Dark Knight Rises, there to carry out her father’s plans for Gotham… so that liaison basically reads as a punishment for him choosing to have a real sex life that isn’t about creating alibis. Diana sleeps with Steve Trevor in Wonder Woman and Wonder Woman 1984, but that ended up creating some extremely squirrely consent issues, and both times it’s a precursor to her losing the guy “forever.” There’s the prolonged sequence for Silk Spectre and Nite Owl in Watchmen (as well as the attempted rape of the original Silk Spectre by the Comedian) because the film painstakingly adapted the majority of comic to screen. The results are incredibly awkward.

The X-Men are a little more flexible on that front, but their super status isn’t quite the same as other heroes—the actual team itself fluctuates often, and as far as the films are concerned, they’re often shown hanging around Xavier’s school and teaching kids. We can assume that Scott Summers and Jean Grey sleep together on account of being married and sharing a room… but Jean dies in X2. Wolverine sleeps with Mariko Yashida in The Wolverine, but it’s a pretty sad affair that comes directly after he saves her life, and it never happens again. Also, he’s technically not an X-Men active operative at the point in time, just an odd hermit who comes out of retirement for a friend. Erik Lensherr has two children within the confines of those films, but both encounters occur when he’s not being Magneto. Deadpool gets his very own on-screen sex marathon (because he’s rated R, kids), but that occurs before he “becomes” Deadpool. By the sequel, he and Vanessa are together again, but state at the start of the film that they’re planning to have sex specifically because they want a kid. Between him and Erik, procreation becomes one of the only situations in which the concept of sex can even be brought up. It doesn’t last for Wade Wilson, though: Immediately after their baby-making conversation, Vanessa is killed.
When we focus on the rest of the lot, especially the current MCU crews, things get even weirder. It’s almost as though there’s an edict stating that active Avengers don’t get laid. Granted, this is never spoken out loud, but it’s true based on what see. For proof of that, you only have to look at Tony Stark himself.
Wait, but Tony Stark is another playboy, like the alter ego Bruce Wayne is so desperate to cultivate, right? Actually, Stark is only shown engaging in any form of sexual activity in his first film, well before he assumes that mantle of Iron Man. Following that he starts up a relationship with Pepper Potts, but if we take the cues we’re given, it seems as though Tony and Pepper are only canoodling when he’s not on Hero Time. Pepper whispers flirty nothings in Tony’s ear at the start of The Avengers, but when Tony is called away by Coulson and he tries to bring her back to the subject of fun adult activities, she says to him: “You mean later? When you’re done?” This practically suggests that their ability to have sex is contingent on him not doing Iron Man stuff. In Iron Man 3, we see Tony and Pepper sharing a bed, but nothing saucy is going on. In fact, Tony has a nightmare that calls his prehensile suit to him in the middle of the night—which almost gets Pepper killed. She then moves to sleep on the couch, leaving him alone.
To make this even more awkward, Pepper and Tony’s daughter Morgan is born post-Snap, at a point in time when Tony is not being Iron Man. We don’t know if Morgan was conceived before the events of Avengers: Infinity War or after Tony arrives home in Endgame, but either way, it was during a period when Tony wasn’t working with the Avengers or donning his supersuit.

But this could just be one example, couldn’t it? Think again. Steve Rogers waits until he can travel back in time to former flame Peggy Carter before he seriously considers getting laid. Sure, he kisses Sharon Carter exactly once, but attempts by his pal Natasha to set him up with coworkers are constantly met with disinterest on his end. And what about the Black Widow? Natasha has certainly used her wiles on targets in her line of work as a Russian spy and a SHIELD agent, but (aside from being different situations entirely when it comes to sex and power dynamics) none of that occurs when she’s acting as a member of the Avengers. She flirts with Bruce Banner, but that’s even more pointed—Bruce hulks out whenever his heart rate gets too high, so sex isn’t really a thing that Natasha and Bruce could get up to. He’s literally the safest bet she can make. Clint Barton has a wife and a bunch of kids, but he’s always away from them when he’s Avengering, so nothing’s going on there.
You’d think an Asgardian would get different rules, but Thor is exactly the same: While he harbors a crush on Jane Foster for quite a while, it’s clear that nothing happens between them until after the events of Thor: The Dark World—after he tells Odin (who is actually Loki) that he doesn’t want to rule Asgard. The only evidence we get of Thor and Jane actually having sex is the post-credits sequence of Dark World, where he sweeps her into a passionate embrace. But then he goes back to working with the Avengers by Age of Ultron, and it’s clear that the relationship deteriorates from that point. T’Challa and Nakia haven’t dated in years when he becomes king and takes up the mantle of the Black Panther, and that relationship sadly cannot progress any further due to actor Chadwick Boseman’s death.
Stephen Strange is similar to Stark in that he used to be a jerk who occasionally slept with people—his relationship with Christine, which he angrily defines as “barely even lovers” certainly indicates that they used to have sex. But once Dr. Strange becomes a student of the mystic arts, all that goes right out the window. He lives on Bleecker Street with Wong, and they worry about how to get money for sandwiches. Star Lord is also introduced on the tail end of a liaison with a woman who he barely remembers, but once the Guardians of the Galaxy are a superteam, all his attention fixes on Gamora. And Gamora definitely wants their relationship to go slowly (even slower now that she’s been revived from an earlier point in her own timeline before she ever knew Quill), which means that they’re not knocking boots any time soon.
Wanda Maximoff and Vision are a prime example in this. Their entire relationship (which we can presume included sex, as they were getting together clandestinely and sharing hotel rooms) occurs after the Sokovia Accords debacle, when Wanda is a fugitive and Vision is technically available to the Avengers in theory, but doesn’t seem to be in rotation. The whole team is mostly disbanded at that point according to Tony, so they’re conducting an affair after being decommissioned as superheroes. And then Vision dies. And then Wanda recreates a life for them in Westview, giving herself the husband and children she dreamed of… and true to her warped reality’s sitcom format, the idea of sex never comes up at all, even when her surprise pregnancy surfaces.

Bucky Barnes is busy recovering from PTSD and brainwashing, Sam Wilson makes mention of trying to date, but we never see anything come from it, and now he has to contend with being Captain America. Then there’s Scott Lang (Ant-Man), who has a child from his pre-hero days, and a burgeoning relationship with Hope Van Dyne—but again, there’s no indication as to whether or not they’ve slept together. Carol Danvers is busy saving galaxies, she’s not even thinking in that direction. James Rhodes doesn’t seem to have a significant other, or at least not one he mentions. Peter Parker is a high-schooler and definitely not ready for that sort of thing, so that’s right out.
And everywhere else, the story is much the same. Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man films are incredibly chaste when it comes to their iteration of Peter Parker: Mary Jane Watson runs from her own wedding, shows up at Peter’s door at the end of Spider-Man 2—and the police radio goes off, luring Peter away to Spider-duties. If there was ever a time for something to happen, that was it… and he’s waylaid by heroing. The same is true of Andrew Garfield’s version in the Amazing Spider-Man films. Peter and Gwen Stacey are clearly very into each other, but they’re also still kids. Oh, and then Gwen dies. Daredevil and Elektra spark, but we don’t see any indication of them sleeping together either. And then Elektra dies. (And then on television, she comes back and Matt Murdock actually considers sex with her as he’s dragging off his super suit and a building collapses on top of them. So, he rejects both his super persona and life while considering getting laid.) Constantine is fighting hell, and doesn’t have the time for much else. No one in the Suicide Squad seems interested, and they’re supposed to be the sort of crew DC doesn’t mind getting freaky. After all, they’re the “bad guys.”
You can make endless excuses as to why this decision gets made over and over; it prevents heroes from reacting to the plot if they’re busy thinking about sex or romance; why does everything have to be about sex anyway; avoiding the topic entirely makes movie sets a safer place for actors, and then you don’t have to hire an intimacy coordinator; think of the children (and the toy sales, won’t someone, please). And of course, not every superhero needs their very own raunchy sex scene because that would be silly. But sex is a normal and healthy part of life for plenty of people, and avoiding the topic entirely ends up reading like a moral stance—especially when you notice that the topic is completely off-limits for someone who is actively pursuing their super-life. The suggestion literally becomes “You can be a hero or you can get some, and those modes shall never intersect.”
Or, to quote DC directly, “Heroes don’t do that.”
When people knock the lack of complexity in most superhero stories, this is a part of the problem. Which isn’t to say that sex equals complexity—it doesn’t, and there are plenty of examples on film in which sex adds nothing to a story whatsoever. But there’s an issue at hand where the messier parts of life get avoided in favor of “bolder” but far simpler statements. If you can’t balance heroism with errands, with run-of-the-mill sadness, with BFF coffee dates, with ugly breakups, with aging and arthritis, with occasionally acknowledging that yes, you would like to go down on someone while wearing your highly impractical batsuit because it resembles certain fetish gear and that’s part of why you chose it… then what’s the point really?
So I’m sorry to the toy industry, and to DC and their copyrights, but they’re wrong. Heroes definitely do that. Selina Kyle wouldn’t settle for anything less.
Emmet Asher-Perrin just thinks this is pretty creepy, the longer you think about it. You can bug them on Twitter, and read more of their work here and elsewhere.
And that’s why “Beef Bourguignon” became a thing for Superman and Lois.
Wanda and Vision were definitely implied to have sex in the 60s episode, in the scene where she uses magic to move their beds together and they both go under the covers. I mean, it’s a very chaste depiction of sex, but there’s no question of what’s happening.
I absolutely agree with you overall–but we did get some sex scenes in Jessica Jones and Luke Cage, though again, when they’re actively rejecting superheroism.
The Hays Code lives!
Asthe article itself implies, it isn’t superhero stories specifically, since sex does occur canonically in some of the comics, but film/tv superheroes.
You must not watch any of the CW’s ARROWVERSE shows. They are all about relationships, and, gasp!, off-screen sex, but, as TV shows, they have time to develop relationships outside of stopping the villain of the week. Action movies don’t have that luxury, and rom com and romance lovers aren’t the audience they are aiming for. Sure, some of us superhero fans enjoy rom coms, but the movie makers can’t stop the plot to ship most of the characters beyond hints like Steven and Peggy, and Tony and Pepper. Personally, I’m okay with that.
There’s a fun scene in the Adam West BATMAN series where Bruce is invited to have some milk and cookies be Lee Meriwether (Catwoman), and he says via the fourth wall that “man cannot live by crime-fighting alone.”
https://youtu.be/QrgJNu1yPs0
I remember the episode of Smallville when Lana somehow got Clark’s super powers and they immediately have super sex, shaking the entire house. LOL. Though, Clark wasn’t exactly Superman yet. That was actually the basis of the show. Any sexy shenanigans yet on Superman & Lois? I don’t want that show.
“When people knock the lack of complexity in most superhero stories, this is a part of the problem.”
It’s getting weird to see people equate the superhero genre with superhero films and ignore where the genre comes from. Most superhero stories aren’t on film, they’re in comics. And plenty of superheroes in the comics are pretty clearly having sex, sometimes on-panel. It’s not an issue with the genre, which doesn’t inherently lack complexity, just with Hollywood. And really just in films, not on television, if Legends of Tomorrow is anything to go by.
Agree with Kait’s comment. You go to the comics, there’s plenty of action taking place.
I do think the majority of this is a function of the suits wanting the superhero movies to be the big family blockbusters so of *course* can’t have “adult” material in them. But I do not understand the deal here with DC telling Harley Quinn creatives no. That show isn’t exactly a kids show. I can only guess that they consider this show to be a bit more high profile than their comics (fair enough) and so they are uncomfortable with anything that might tarnish their “brand”. Still, seems to indicate a bit of a regressive attitude on their parts.
I have not seen any of the Harley Quinn animated series (there are practical limits to how many streaming services I can usefully juggle), but I think there’s something missing here, because insofar as I can tell, the dynamics of the supposed problem don’t actually make sense as they’ve been presented.
First: as various folks have pointed out, there’s fairly extensive precedent for the idea that these characters have sex lives – and in some cases, those sex lives get more than a little weird, even in the animated shows. The explicit action happens offscreen in the animated versions, but there’s enough onscreen chemistry to make the implications clear.
But that’s not what was supposedly nixed, as I understand it, in the Harley Quinn case. As described, the scene in question would have clearly depicted a sex act involving Batman and Catwoman. And I just don’t see how that’s physically possible…
…because there is simply no way for most fully costumed superheroes (or, in the majority of cases, supervillains, though there’s more wiggle room on that side of the aisle) to engage in most sex acts while in costume.
I mean, really. The vast majority of superhero outfits are at least one of (a) extremely form-fitting, (b), bristling with weapons and attachments, (c) equipped with heavy masks and/or hoods, (d) armored or otherwise enhanced to protect the wearer. This – a good deal of handwaving in various incarnations notwithstanding – makes them inherently difficult to put on and take off quickly, unless one has magical quick-change powers as a part of one’s super-abilities. (This is why, if I’m ever recruited to that club, I want to be a Green Lantern.) And there is virtually no situation in which any rational super-person on either side of the hero/villain street would willingly be half in costume and half…not, especially in the combination you’d need in order to engage in sexual intimacy.
So if the scene in question were to show the characters in full costume, it’s flat-out impossible for it to be an explicit sex scene. OTOH, if the scene in question were to show them out of costume, and engaging in an explicit sex act, the strong implication is that they’re fully or at least mostly nude – and if that’s the case, the “can’t sell toys” argument makes very little sense, because if the characters are nude and having sex, they’re not functioning as their super-selves.
That said, I can see at least a tenuous case for objecting to that degree of explicit action in an animated Bat-series – not on the grounds of “can’t sell toys/Batman doesn’t do that”, but because it’s going to be next to impossible in the long run to keep an NC-17 animated Bat-series out of the hands of minors. But if that’s the actual issue underlying this, you’d think it would have been framed more clearly in the first place.
So color me confused.
IIRC, wasn’t having sex with Lois the cause of Superman losing his powers in the second Christopher Reeve movie?
So would DC have been okay with Batman performing vanilla missionary position sex while in costume? Was it just the fact it was oral that they couldn’t stomach? (sorry, I couldn’t resist)
[eyeroll]
#10: You couldn’t go there with a Batcowl on – between the ears and the neckpiece, you wouldn’t have enough maneuvering room. And anyway, if the Catsuit is still on its owner, there’s nowhere to connect.
[is mildly boggled at having this discussion, however obliquely]
@11 Yeah I thought of asking what DC’s problem was since obviously Batman would have to remove his mask. But then, in certain positions, that nose could be useful, right?
As for the Catsuit, it depends on the customization!
Guess I’ll need to watch the new Harley season now and try to figure out where the going down scene would have been inserted.
Also, Bucky and Falcon are too busy bicker-flirting to date.
Batman and Batgirl has sex while in uniform (undressing as foreplay) in The Killing Joke. In the movie theater people were shocked by the scene…though was it because these two had sex, or because it was not in the graphic novel, or because getting out of their costumes seemed less than glamorous (and easy, considering their costumes are meant as armor), I don’t know. Well, I know my reason. Laughter, uncomfortable laughter, soon began in the dark.
@John C Bunnell: “And I just don’t see how that’s physically possible…
…because there is simply no way for most fully costumed superheroes (or, in the majority of cases, supervillains, though there’s more wiggle room on that side of the aisle) to engage in most sex acts while in costume.”
Um, I assume you haven’t seen any pron parodies of superhero films… There’s plenty of ways to get around costumes; or so I’ve heard…
@mp1952: “wasn’t having sex with Lois the cause of Superman losing his powers in the second Christopher Reeve movie?”
The Fortress of Solitude/ Kal’s Daddy’s AI removed his powers so that Clark could have sex with a human woman. ( A Freudian would likely have fun with that one.) So the sex didn’t cause the loss; he gave them up so that he could have sex. Which fits with the theme of this article.
@9,11 John C. Bunnell: You’re making it much more complicated than it would need to be. The costumes come off. Batman and Catwoman have hooked up on a rooftop. It’s canon.
@16, Actually it was Supes mother’s recording who took his powers away.
Obviously Superheroing is murder on ones love life. I mean how can you make a date if your liable to be interrupted by a red phone or a sign in the sky?
@18: so is that more Freudian or less?
Superman? Having sex?
Does no one remember Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex?
http://www.rawbw.com/~svw/superman.html
Batman, having sex in his armor?
“Really seals in the flavor.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enOHraf3LEk (NSFW language)
@Fernhunter: Ugh. I was hoping no one would bring Niven into this. That was stupid and juvenile even back then.
“I’m not talking fashion, Mr Fox, so much as function.”
“You want to be able to turn your head.”
I’ve never actually found any of Batman’s romantic relationships to be convincing. It just doesn’t seem to fit a guy who canonically thinks of himself as Batman, and thinks of “Bruce” as a cover identity.
This is definitely a hot topic :p

If you consider “being a superhero/ine” as a job, similar to being a teacher, plumber, bus driver, doctor, etc., then this makes more sense. How many people within those professions have sex while on the job and in their professional uniform/outfit (rhetorical question)? I am sure it happens but I am also sure it is more the exception than the rule. Also, when you are really into your job and working hard, lacking the energy for carnal activities afterwards (or during) is also very common – same I guess with superheroes. So, all perfectly normal and logical. :-)
If you dismiss a long term relationship when “we don’t see any indication of them sleeping together”, but characters getting into a double bed doesn’t qualify either, I don’t know what you are looking for which we’re going to see in a family show. Or when a superhero couple takes a day off together, that doesn’t count. When they hump right after an action scene, that’s “awkward”. When is undressing ever not awkward? That is, (1) awkward or (2) too slow, e.g. “The Pink Panther Strikes Again”, where it’s both.
You mentioned Green Lantern: I think I remember Carol Ferris explaining to him on screen that she’s seen him naked before and the costume doesn’t leave much to wonder about. I suppose you’d rule out the Invisible Woman (Fantastic Four) because… she’s invisible…
Iron Man used to have that heart condition, so he squired many women but not at risk to his health. In fact, he wore the vest of Iron Man at all times to maintain his heartbeat, and he had to recharge it from wall outlets.
There is, of course, a category of films which mainly are about people’s sex episodes; sometimes those people are superheroes.
The “unrated” DVD of “Hancock” has a fuck scene, does that count? I haven’t seen it and I do not know who fucks whom. I only know that a Parental Anxiety web site has reported it so that you don’t have to see it.
P.S. Iceman is gay now. Something to look forward to.
You didnt talk about the Titans TV show – Dick and Kory definitely get it on in the motel room when they are on the run. they arent in costume, they arent on duty – they are turning in for the night while on the run from that creepy family.
That said, why does it have to be in costume? They are the same person underneath, isnt it? I agree with those who have posted that it probably is painful to take off all that stuff when you have something else on your mind, right?
This must be one of the more amusing ‘Storm in a teacup’ episodes of the year thus far. My honest opinion on it is that YES, Superheroes obviously have sex lives, but that some contexts are more appropriate for the exploration of that sort of thing than others.
For example, a cartoon that – despite being cheerfully indifferent to the idea of an all ages audience – generally looks like something kids have as much of a right as their parents to take an interest in (so long as you ignore what actually happens in the average episode) might well trigger a ‘THINK OF THE CHILDREN!’ reflex in DC Authorities (especially if it’s only one of many issues crossing their desks and therefore gets less than their complete focus).
Also, it bears pointing out that any sort of sex scene featuring costumes is inherently more kinky than mere nudity and might therefore distract audiences from just about everything else in any given series when coupled with the inherent subversiveness of characters created as the stuff of children’s adventure fiction getting down to some ‘adult’s only’ content.
Given that, so far as I can tell, none of the discussion of this particular hot button issue bothers to mention what exact circumstances require us to watch cartoon characters getting up to stuff more usually reserved for Live Action, it’s hard to say that fears of everyone completely losing the plot over this scene of costumed adventurer nookie were completely unjustified.
p.s. It also bears pointing out that a key element separating superheroes from their villainous counterparts is motivation: it’s much more difficult to sell the character as doing what they do for the right reasons if audiences get the impression that it’s mostly a kink thing, rather than a more purely altruistic motivation.
I think that the primary reason is that super hero films are geared to what in novels we would call a YA audience – attraction and maybe kissing but no sex, even implied. Any R ratings tend to be for violence rather than sexual content.
As far as sex in costume, I’ve always wondered about the required rather than optional human activity. Do super heroes wear absorbent diapers under their costumes?
@8 &@9 in DC comics, in particular “edgy” New 52 storyline which was supposed to be mature and violent, Batman and Catwoman have sex in costumes on screen. You should have heard the uproar it involved. Words “gratuitous” and “not sexy” were bandied around. Combine with recoil from Batman/Batgirl sex scene in the Killing Joke, I can see why DC executives would steer clear of sex in suits in animated series. After all, regardless on how far US moved on in their attitudes toward animation for adults, there is still fear in executives hearts that a kid would watch the show since after all its Batman+Cartoon
So I actually know a guy who produces (and sometimes acts in) movies that show superhero sex. Fairly Extremely explicitly. And, yes, it’s definitely fetish material.
And if you’re not a fetishist it is very funny. (Also a bit squicky for my tastes, but my tastes are fairly vanilla.)
@20. Fernhunter
I think of this every time someone brings up “superhero sex”.



For those superheroes who are technically not human (Superman, Vision, etc) isn’t sex with an earthling kinda like like doing it with an intelligent warthog (regardless of appearances, they are technically different species)?
As someone who carries a pager as part of his professional life, I can attest that physicians on call (regardless of what Dr. Gray, Kildare, or Welby would have us think) cannot get started on things that would have to be stopped if the pager goes off. When on duty, no one (including superheroes) want to start something that they might be called away from in the middle…
@33: As many SF novels will tell you, inter-species sex is not uncommon. The purpose is pleasure (or release) rather than procreation. And even in uniform, frottage is always a possibility.
As an explanation that the super heroes might give, I think your second point, not having sex on the job, is probably the most likely.
How about the Watchmen? Or is that outside of this discussion somehow?
The Boys on Amazon covers the Super’s sex lives. The good, the bad, and the rapes.
Netflix’s “Jessica Jones.” Jessica and Luke literally destroy a bed. On screen. Beautifully.
Only came to the comments to be sure Legends was mentioned. :D Plenty of sex and relationships and active superheroing.
@19, so is that more Freudian or less?
Good Question!
More I think. Very Oedipal.
I am reminded of an essay I read in one of the classic SF magazines (maybe Astounding?) in the 1970’s about this very topic. It was about Superman. The argument went as follows: one of Superman’s powers is flying, so presumably all of his body cells have this capability. Also, humans do not have conscious control of smooth muscles also known as autonomous muscles. As a result, when the adolescent Superman masturbated, it would be like a Howitzer going off due to the super strength of his autonomous muscles. But even worse is the implication of all those super flying sperm cells released into the world which would be flying throughout the world to fulfill their mission…
I’m surprised Venom didn’t come up. The movie is a romcom disguised as a superhero origin story (and The Kiss definitely isn’t purely chaste). Meanwhile in the comics, it’s been established that Eddie and Symby get it on for health reasons.
This is stupid. This article simply ignores reality for a flashy headline. Superheroes do not have sex. Period. Just like NFL players don’t have sex on the field and NBA players don’t get it on during time outs. THEY ARE ON THE CLOCK. A super with his mask on is fighting crime. That is what it means to be a hero. It’s their literal job. Expecting heroes to break social norms to get their rocks off is counter to the entire idea of heroes and paragons.
To say that because we don’t see it on screen, there’s no further sexuality in Deadpool is just plain inaccurate. Remember the bit where he’s regrowing his arm? Or how about when he reveals his face to Vanessa, and she says (approximately) “it’s a face I could learn to stand sitting on”?! And then in Deadpool 2 we get the much celebrated relationship between Negasonic and Yukio, and sure, we only see them holding hands, but their ongoing relationship as girlfriends is in no way unclear (and not playing the lesbianism for laughs or sex appeal, given that movie context, was actually an intentional choice made to *normalize* it). Really, the big change with those movies is that Deadpool is treated as monogamous, which… is still a heck of a step down from the comics…. but there’s no question that sexuality and relationships remain present, and neither lesbian superheroine gets killed off, either!
But Deadpool is R Rated… and unlike most of these films, never had a chance of getting allowed in the Chinese market anyway. China’s harsh censorship is a big factor in the *movies’* lack of sexuality, especially any sort of queer sexuality. I hate that the industry has chosen to cater to the Chinese censors in the name of Mammon, but there’s little to be done about that, sadly, and that’s one major answer to the question of why this is a thing.
And cartoons are still seen as “for kids”, despite the rise of anime (see: the toy sales angle). That said, I’m not sure if the one that was prohibited from showing Batman going down on Catwoman was the same one, but there was definitely a whole thing last year about this or a similar cartoon, in which Constantine was revealed to have had King Shark as an ex. I’ve seen the clip, it’s quite funny.
I think that “Superhero Sex
” as you want to see it is a specific fetish. Like Policeman Sex, or Nurse sex.
You see, i am a nurse. I work in a hospital, and dress in my scrubs every day. And then when i get home, i change into relaxing around home clothing, becaue my scrubs imply to me a mindset of “i am at work, this is my career outfitt” The loose t-shirt and sweatpants, while feeling ALMOST identical to my scrubs are not scrubs and therefor give me the Mindset of ” I am NOT at work” Think of this as the same as a superhero costume. If Clark came to Lois in his super tights and tried to slip in bed with her and said….”Wanna see something faster then a speeding bullet?” would be the same as me slipping into bed with my boyfriends and saying ” Want me to take your trmperature, the fun way??” IN both casues those would be a kink of fetish , whereas most time we have sex (ne and my BF or Lois and Clark) that doesnt happen
Like it or not, wide-scale comics originated as children’s entertainment at a time when any mention of sex was forbidden, and then any implication of it forbidden by the Comics Code, so in some ways the Comics World grew up as one without sex.
On another level, there seem to be a lot of media about touting the false narrative that rich people don’t really have it better than the rest of us—sorry, but growing-up far away from material worries generally—generally, mind you—produces someone healthier, taller, stronger, and yes, happier than most of the people reading this. The narrative that tries to deny this is popular, though, being very useful to the rich and assuaging the justified feelings of unfairness the rest of us bear. Perhaps, similarly, the notion that a hero can’t have a decent sex-life is a way of making them a little less insufferably superior to the rest of us.
I’m glad someone mentioned Luke Cage and Jessica Jones from the Marvel TV shows. They explicitly talk about their superpowers before/after having sex and specifically test them while having sex.
On the other hand, Luke and Jessica are specifically not costumed heroes. In fact, there’s an argument that they’re not superheroes at all. They’re just heroes and maybe antiheroes.
So depending on how you want to read them, they’re either an exception that proves the “rule” or they’re a demonstration of the rule. Either way, the “rule” turns on the idea that superheroes are “super.” That is, they’re better than the rest of us. They’re not people. They’re ideals. And as ideals they’re represented by their costumes.
What DC’s said, essentially, isn’t that Bruce Wayne doesn’t go down on Selina or even on Catwoman, but that the Batsuit doesn’t fuck. Fair, because it’s true, the suit doesn’t. I see this as embodying a specific cultural moment where we stuck between wanting superheroes as ideals and wanting to see imperfect flawed people as capable of heroism.
Go figure. Our visual culture is as confused as we are. (Personally, though, I make my superheroes fuck in costume all the time. It’s hot. And the logistics of superhero suits in sex are downright funny.)
I mean there was a period in the comics relatively recently where Bat and Cat knocked boots on a rooftop partly in their suits. And Selina was explicitly against taking off the masks for the encounter. He knows over 20 different languages I refuse to believe he’s not a skilled Cunning Linguist.
For those commenting that Larry Niven’s “Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex” hasn’t been mentioned yet in the comments, please see #20. It’s been covered.
I think a few mentioned but definitely happens in Titans. Other than that, I think there is always the implied side that yes it happens, but do we need the details?
Mea culpa; it’s my fault the discussion got so thoroughly sidetracked onto the costume-logistics angle, which is amusing, but ultimately a distraction. The real question is not and has never been “do superheroes have sex”? Of course they do, and we’ve brought up a host of examples to illustrate the point.
Nor is it even “Do superheroes have oral sex?” – again, despite Justin Halpern’s comments to Variety in the article from which all the fuss has arisen. It’s worth noting that as far as I can tell, every last bit of the reportage traces back to that one article – there’s been absolutely no mention of any corporate-level response from DC/Warner on the matter.
The real question is specifically about the Harley Quinn animated Batseries running on HBO-Max, and whether it’s appropriate for that series to depict an explicit sex scene. It’s hard to tell just how explicit, but Halpern’s quote says “we had a moment when Batman was going down on Catwoman.” If we assume he meant exactly what he said – which I think we have to – that indicates both significant onscreen nudity and specific positioning of the relevant body parts to clearly establish that “going down” is going on. Halpern may or may not have pitched the scene as an actual X-rated action shot, but we’re absolutely meant to believe that this was going to be an on-screen sex scene.
Now as I mentioned earlier, I’ve not seen even one episode of the Harley Quinn series (a trailer or two, yes), so I don’t know how graphic it’s been up to this point. But I do not get the impression that the show has been particularly slanted toward the erotic up till now, at least not in a visual sense. Nor do I see anything in the comments upstream to suggest that Harley Quinn has gone all that much farther than any of its predecessor Batseries in terms of onscreen sex. (Note that seeing pieces of costume on the floor and characters wrapped up in sheets is not onscreen sex – network soap operas, er, daytime dramas, go that far all the time.)
No, what I distrust in Halpern’s comments is his framing of the executive response. It’s not that I doubt that DC/Warner executives would disapprove of upping the Harley Quinn rating to NC-17 or its TV equivalent. I expect they do and did, and said so. No, what I suspect is that Halpern and his team mapped out an NC-17 onscreen oral sex scene and sent it up to Corporate knowing full well that it would be disapproved – and that once they got that disapproval, Halpern deliberately told the story to the Variety reporter with just enough goody-two-shoes spin put on the rejection to cause Internet fandom to rise up in righteous wrath, as indeed it has.
And now that we’ve done so, Halpern will go back to DC execs and negotiate just enough strategically placed Bat-cape blocking the relevant body parts (and just enough careful editing to bring the movie-equivalent rating down to the high end of an R) to get the revised scene approved, so that everyone can save face and credit the Internet for making them see the error of their ways.
In other words, people, we’ve been played. It’s as simple as that.
Now this I can believe. If the execs were comfortable with the anti-Semitic episode in season one depicting Oswald Cobblepot and his wife as a Jewish couple whose child achieves their bar/bat mitzvah (can’t recall, not germane anyway), Batman playing with Catwoman’s kitty is nothing in comparison.
As for the mechanics question… her outfit is basically a unitard. His is armor. They both have to pee now and then. And he needs to turn his head. Zip, click, zip, done. Even easier when his outfit was more like hers.
Oh, don’t start me on Steve Rogers and Peggy Carter. Peggy’s a terrific character and also, maddeningly, a vehicle for no-homo-ing the relationship between Steve and Bucky. From the first Captain America movie through the end of Winter Soldier and Civil War, Steve and Bucky have a classic romantic arc, complete with the obligatory tropes of separation / alienation / reconciliation. This is to say nothing of Steve’s rescues of Bucky in CA:TFA, which comes with a charming bedside reunion scene, and CW. There really, really needed to be some epic kissing at a minimum.
@davep1, I think maybe you haven’t read a lot of YA novels lately …
@53 – “In other words, people, we’ve been played. It’s as simple as that.”
You admitted you never watched the show. The idea that a DC animated show would try to include an X rated shot is absurd. There is no nudity in this show, FYI.
@53: Thank you for the Quinn clarification. I was not aware of the source article but your analysis of it makes perfect sense. It will be interesting to see (or read about – I don’t watch the series either) DC’s response. I suspect you are right about the hard R version being allowed.
BUT, I wonder if the Cat will go down on the Bat instead of the Bat going down on the Cat because of DC’s desire to not show Batman in the submissive position.
The whole Arrowverse only exists because Green Arrow wanted to shag his girlfriend’s sister. It is the only reason why he gets on the boat.
As the universe has grown, plenty of its characters have sex/show their sex appeal. Legends is probably the most obvious example but Supergirl and Flash have plenty of examples of health sex lives as well.
@davep1, you write:
BUT, I wonder if the Cat will go down on the Bat instead of the Bat going down on the Cat because of DC’s desire to not show Batman in the submissive position.
If the people at DC think it’s inherently submissive to go down on someone (or, for that matter, that there’s anything wrong with being submissive in sex) … — you know, I can’t think of where to take that sentence, because my head is exploding.
Nevermind the Bat and the Cat. Will we see Harley and Ivy go down.
@ancientreader: you’re defining your personal headcanon. Nothing wrong with that of course, but it isn’t what 70-80 years of character history says. Even the first Cap movie introduced us to Bucky going on a double date with Steve and two women. When Steve bugs out, Bucky goes on with both women. If he was not there for Steve, he would’ve dropped the women.
Projection, wishful thinking, fan fiction, looking for subtext: all acts of the imagination. We all do that to some extent. But insisting something’s there when it isn’t is just an attempt at rewriting the text.
@51: And that text piece you read once about superhero sex, but you forgot the title? It almost certainly was MOSWOK.
Of course Superheroes have sex. Just not while they are working. Like most people.
@64 You may have never worked in a place that has private cubicles. Or even private stalls in the bathroom. I have and people do all sorts of things while at work.
@55 of course it’s germane. If the Cobblepotts have a daughter it would be a BAT Mitzvah…
@65, Obviously I have led a sheltered life!