It’s the end of the world like you’ve never known it: snarky and sassy with strangely touching moments weaved into a quick-moving story, Greg van Eekhout’s
Norse Code
(Spectra) manages to turn a fresh edge on old myths. And it’s probably the only re-weaving of Ragnarok where the poor blind guy, the one who started the countdown to Doomsday, is actually a sympathetic and participatory character rather than a footnote in lore.
What an odd piece of work Norse Code is.
In many ways, the book fits neatly into the slot of Paranormal Mystery. There are certain tropes that show up: the sarcastic, disillusioned Slacker Guy protagonist, trying to get an even break of less adventure than fate bestows upon him; or the driven, conflicted Strong Girl protagonist, fighting her way out of an oppressive system with roots tapping deep into ancient mythos. Bring to the party ancient supernatural entities who surprisingly prefer tea and honey in plastic bears over fights for spiritual domination and riddles… of course, a twisted maze of Big Bad Villains What Are Gods and Beings You Don’t Wanna Mess With… mix in plenty of beatings of the main character, extreme high stakes, much eventual and glorious ass-kicking by the main character.
This modern template is oft-repeated with slight modifications—a change of the city of operations, sometimes successfully given life, sometimes less so. The P.I. character may be supernatural, or may just be unfortunately blessed with other world contact. Sometimes the structure given popping zing (like Tim Pratt’s Marla Mason series) or completely turned on its head (like Liz Williams’ Detective Inspector Chen series), and sometimes it’s less heartfelt rehash.
Norse Code should have been another series of ticks in the checklist of paranormal P.I. fiction, and yet it rises above that. It is refreshing, and doesn’t make the myth scholar in me want to puke at adaptation of myth.
What does Norse Code bring to the table? There are four main successes here. The first is that the storyline combines the two types of private investigators, while giving them actual professions that aren’t, I don’t know, just mortal private investigators. Having multiple viewpoints is a godsend in this genre (see Williams’ series for one). Mist is a fledgling assassin who doesn’t like the way things are going for the company she works with (it is, after all, a front for Someone Godly Huge who really wants to bring about apocalypse now). Hermod is the other, your occasional messenger boy who really does lounge on beaches when possible as opposed to being a repressed workaholic. And a god; one of the sons of Odin.
Most authors get about as close as angels. This is downright cheeky.
The second success is the way that the gods, from Hermod to Freya, Baldr to Hod, the whole Asgard gang, are portrayed. There are more touches of Neil Gaiman than most incarnations, a blending of our modern world and the ancient myths, with a knowledgeable and fertile imagining of how things might have developed after the myths ended. This requires more than merely picking off popular elements along; it’s effectively alternate history with a mythical twist, and van Eekhout does an excellent job, playing with Norse mythology in both a faithful and retconned way. The balance is hard to get right, and I think it works in Norse Code.
The third success is the way that Eekhout gives attention to both the significant gods and the little people. The Valkyries, the Heroic Dead, the caught-in-the-middle humans, and the, well, Other Dead who get to go to Hel for not being stupidly brave enough—bringing them in as main characters (another aspect of the Gaiman-like touch). It’s not just Mist, it’s also her sister shot dead in Mist’s recently troubled past, who would usually play the part of Past Inspiring Memory; it’s Hod, the blind god whom everyone normally scapegoats and then ignores; it’s Grimnir, a Heroic Dead who should have been a villain; it’s a dead town of Iowans.
And the fourth success? Eekhout raises the stakes as high as they can go—and the way he brings the house down is excellent in its pathos without getting drowned in wangst and the plot twists to wrench victory from the jaws of defeat. van Eekhout is daring—that’s one of The Dresden Files’ strengths, but Norse Code takes it to another level and then some.
In fact, I want to see van Eekhout do a sequel, because I’m sadistic like that.
So: standing ovation here. If there’s one thing that kind of twitches me, it’s that the love relationships fall too easily into place, which is one of the few elements that is, to me, tiringly stereotypical. But otherwise Norse Code is a great, fun ride out to space-time.
The Kindle Bit
The publisher of Norse Code is Bantam books. How do they hold up?
First, the right things: preserving the decorative chapter titles. Paragraph spacing, margins, and indenting is right, even in places other than the main text. From a readability standpoint, very good. Even the title page is nicely done.
Second, the wrong things: no image cover apart from the horrible Bantam generic. No table of contents (and thus less easy access to Other Books By). Forcing left justification of text.
Fewer sins than most publishers, but it’s not HarperCollins quality, which is admittedly a high bar. But Bantam’s formatting in this case is highly readable, and that’s very good in this field.
(And that’s a rant for another day.)
Terrific review. I just read the book last weekend and loved it. I didn’t know how the book could possibly end, and then when I got there, it was evident it couldn’t have gone any other way.
I purchased the Fictionwise ebook edition and read it on my iPhone using the eReader and Stanza apps. (Both work fine, and are more adjustable than the Kindle app. Kindle books appear significantly cheaper, though, at least before Fictionwise club discounts and credits.)
I have a few problems with the book, despite really wanting to like it going in. It’s a matter of taste, but I’m not a big fan of apocalypse stories. The worse things get, the more distracted I get by the (implied) carnage. The modern world is a relatively delicate thing. Think New Orleans and Katrina on a worldwide basis. As bad as things got in Norse Code, I didn’t feel like they really were shown to be as bad as they should be, particularly in the denoument.
Next is a problem I have with a lot of ‘kickass female characters’. Mist started off impressively, and became progressively less so throughout the book. It’s a power imbalance issue, given that she’s a (new) Valkyrie and the major players are gods and giants, but she still felt like she was just along for the ride for most of it, quite literally in a few places. Her boss, by contrast, felt much more competent for most of the book.
Finally, and this is a problem I have with most noir-themed novels, is that it felt hollow. The early Dresden novels had this problem, and most other ‘urban fantasy’ and a lot of high fantasy: if you’re building a world that’s supposed to be gritty and real, it has to actually feel gritty and real. It has to feel like if you took the heroes and the villains away, it would continue on by itself. I’m not sure that can work in a story that’s about gods and the end of the world, but that’s the jarring aspect to it.
Butcher’s Codex Alera series is a real contrast to this, despite being much more high fantasy. The society he built feels like it has a working economy, social contract, religion, and so forth. The Dresden novels took a while to feel this way, but they now feel like they have a solid sense of being grounded in (a) real world. In Norse Code, take the gods and goddesses away and you have, literally, nothing. Unfortunately that works solidly against the noir theme of doing the right thing because it’s the right thing, and not because it will necessarily change the world for the better.
M. Ellis,
Thank you for the counterpoint.
I tend to think that the point of Norse Code was the play between gods; the entire world is based on Norse mythology being true. Take away the mythology, and of course you haven’t got anything; that would be like taking away the realms of faerie from The Dresden Files.
Gritty reality also wasn’t the aim of Norse Code; by the time the events of the book roll around, the world has been very, very far gone for quite some times. Reality went fluid.
This was far more of a Gaiman-style piece than your typical urban private investigator piece. Which I rather like for a change of pace.
Reading Norse Code by a Gaiman style ruleset works better, admittedly. I’m still not sure I would have loved the book, but I might have liked it somewhat better.
Greg van Eekhout is a likable writer, and I’m reluctant to say anything against his work, but yes, Norse Code did seem thin. Something like Robert Parker on his off days: admirably lucid writing, with everything extraneous trimmed away, but about to evaporate like dew.
As for Norse Code’s being like Gaiman, there’s more than one way to look at that. Gaiman’s stories have a sense of being rooted in a larger, and older, world, one that has lots of interesting textures and oddities that have nothing to do with what we’re talking about right now. There’s a British discursiveness about it, sort of sitting at the fire on a cold night and rambling on about local legends and the footnotes of history. The House on the Rock, for example. Rather than expressing the child’s sense that the protagonist is the center of the world, doing the only things that might matter, against a background that matters only in terms of the plot, his writing implies that people come and go, while places don’t, and they have lots of other interesting stories to tell. It’s the way you think if you grow up somewhere that knows it has a history.
Norse Code is Californian rather than British.
Forcing left justification of text.
Is this a term of art I’m not familiar with? I usually think of left justification as what we’ve got on this blog (text aligned at left margin, ragged right), right justification the reverse (text aligned at right margin, ragged left) though often confused with full justification (text aligned at both margins).
@@@@@ katenepveu
(begin type geekery) Actually, what we have on this blog is type set as flush left, ragged right, where all text is aligned to the left, and ragged right, regardless of line length (which is, I believe, what AJ was alluding to). Most books are set as justified left, which is where the full block is justified, but any substantially shorter lines, like the last line in a paragraph, are set to the left. This is different from full justification, which is when every line is set so that it fills up the whole measure (width of the text block), regardless of line length. (end type geekery)
Ah-ha! So word processing programs lie to me. Somehow I am not surprised.
I was going to say something else but then I decided it was too off-topic, but if either of you ever wanted to do a type geekery post, I at least would be thrilled . . .
Pablo is the type geek, and I just complain about ebook formatting from time to time. *g*
Left justified and ragged right was what I was referring to; it’s often just called left justification versus full justification in ebook readers. You can set this on some ebook readers if it’s not been forced one way or the other.
However, if left justification is enforced style-wise in the book (through CSS for Mobipocket, epub, and Microsoft Lit; or through special formatting directives as in PML for eReader and BBeB for Sony LRF), then the reader software can’t change it. (Similarly for full justification and, I’m sorry to say, right-justified-ragged-left.
I prefer to read with full justification. (And yes, I do even if someone tells me that ragged right is more correct/readable.)
This book sounds really good. I picked it up at my local B&N this evening, and it is climbing its way up my to be read pile.
My first thought when I got it from Amazon was, “dang, this is a short book.” After finishing the book last night, I still feel that way.
The book sort of felt like the author had a set number of words/pages in his mind and once he hit it, he just quickly ran through the climax and ending.
This isn’t to say I didn’t enjoy it, I did; I just felt like it was a bit rushed.
The book did remind me why I have enjoyed Norse mythology though: the gods are not always larger than life. In Norse mythology, the gods could be made accountable to the people; when Loki slew Otter his father demanded the gods fill his skin with gold and cover it with gold. Odin tasked Loki with procuring the gold and as usual Loki inserted some trickery which led to a series of adventures for Otter’s family and their descendants, but the gold was paid. Not exactly a prevalent theme in other mythos/religions.
One last note, it did make me want to play Too Human again…
Just me?