I’ve been a fan of McKinley’s for some time, but I was disappointed by her last two novels so I didn’t rush for Pegasus (2010) when it came out. It was a talking flying pony book, after all, and early reviews pointed out that it was half a book and did not resolve. I was glad I knew that because it is true—this is not a complete story, and this is the first time that I can think of that McKinley has done this. There will be a sequel. Good. I’ll be buying it. Because, while it is absolutely true that this is a talking flying pony book with a perfect princess who is the only one who can really talk to the pegasi, it’s also surprisingly fun. Fortunately, I’m not one to dismiss a book unconsidered because horses talk.
The thing that makes this an actually good book is the culture of the pegasi. The backstory, explained on the first page, is that humans arrived in this country at a medieval tech level eight hundred years ago to find the pegasi about to lose a war to wyverns, rocs, and other monsters. The humans and pegasi made an alliance by which the pegasi got the highlands and the humans the lowlands, and the human royalty and pegasus royalty undergo a ceremony of binding which makes up for the fact that they can’t learn each other’s languages. All this changes when Sylviianel, Sylvi for short, and her pegasus Ebon truly bond and can talk telepathically.
So far so utterly predictable, and so satisfying for the id but irritating for the superego. The world and the worldbuilding, are very satisfying. (Except if you’re going to complain that they’re still medieval after eight hundred years. But if that bothers you, why are you reading fantasy in the first place? Moving swiftly on…) For one thing, McKinley is using very different mythology here, and to good effect. For another, Sylvi’s mother the queen is rarely home as she’s always off leading the army against monsters. Best of all, Sylvi’s amazing ability is greeted with fear and mistrust by a political grouping of humans, and Sylvi’s father the king has to work around this. And this is before we even get to the nifty stuff about how intelligent flying horse culture works.
There’s a lot of magic. There are magical creatures. This is the stuff one expects McKinley to get right and she absolutely does. I started out with some scepticism about this and was completely won over. Every time I rolled my eyes, it turned out to be set up for something much better—anything superficially dumb ends up with a very clever and satisfying explanation. Also, pegasi envy human hands, as humans envy the pegasus flight. They have culturte. They have factions. They have problems, and so do the humans.
I’ve argued that the reason we have so many fantasy stories about kings and princesses is because the fairy tale originals of such stories are really about families, blown up in scale. This is certainly true of Pegasus, it’s a story about growing up in a family and having responsibilities, expanded out. It’s also very sincere. Sometimes I read something, particularly YA, and I feel as if the author is a step behind the words sneering at the reader. Here I feel that McKinley knows perfectly well that this is the ultimate princess and pony book and is thinking “YES!” This is all deftly handled. I thought Chalice was thin and Dragonhaven was tedious, but McKinley is really back in form here.
My considered reflection on Pegasus is that it would be absolutely perfect if I were eleven, and you should all buy this for the eleven year olds in your life. Also, unless you’re absolutely allergic to the idea of intelligent pegasi you should read it yourself, because your inner eleven year old will thank you for it.
Jo Walton is a science fiction and fantasy writer. She’s published two poetry collections and nine novels, most recently Among Others, and if you liked this post you will like it. She reads a lot, and blogs about it here regularly. She comes from Wales but lives in Montreal where the food and books are more varied.
Sounds like an interesting book… What’s “culturte”, though? “culture”? Or is it a term of art I’m not familiar with?
Thanks for the review. This does sound like the sort of book that my inner 11-year-old (who still hasn’t quite forgiven me for giving away the collection of toy ponies) needs to read.
Given that it’s only half a book, any idea when the sequel will be out?
i picked this up about a year ago and didn’t know that it was only half a book, finished it and was absolutely livid- as stated above, robin mckinley doesn’t normally do that sort of thing. after following her blog, it sounds like she is mostly done writing the sequel, but couldn’t fit all the story she wanted into it, so it’s going to be a trilogy. which i’m perfectly happy with, as my inner 11 year old really loved this story.
RMGiroux: I’m dead certain it was a typo for “culture”. (Note how t is right next to r on the keyboard.)
I used to love McKinley, but share your assessment of Chalice as thin and Dragonhaven tedious, so I hadn’t bought Pegasus when it came out. I will definitely look to get it now, though may wait to read until the sequel is published.
Oh, I am soooo happy to see that other readers were unimpressed with Dragonhaven. But I quite enjoy Chalice, and re-read it almost as often as I do Beauty (but nowhere near as often as I re-read The Blue Sword.)
Pegasus is sitting in my TBR, awaiting the complition of the story.
Chalice reads like a short story; it and Dragonhaven were supposed to be short stories in Fire. I liked the former and think the latter would have been better as a short story.
Somehow I knew Pegasus was half a book when I started, so I wasn’t mad. It’s as id-fulfilling as Dragonsinger but I think it’s sturdier. I’m looking forward to the rest of it, although like with Connie Willis’s latest I’m skeptical it needed to be two books.
As a McKinley fan from way back, I looked at this one and thought, “OMG, she’s written a book just for ME!!!!” I didn’t know it was a part one, and about had a medical emergency when I got to the end. McKinley *never* does sequels, she’s famous for it. Her site says the sequel is due out in 2014. Not…soon…enough… Waiting to reread this one for when I have the next in hand.
(I still have my Breyer horse collection. It’s packed in a box, but I have it…)
absolutely agree about chalice (sweet but i don’t remember much of it) and dragonhaven (novella-length would have been better) but so glad to hear pegasus is good… i’ve had it for a while but have been reluctant to read it. sunshine and the blue sword, on the other hand, are fairly regular re-reads.
I think Chalice lost me right at the title – something about the immensely cheesy, tired connection of Woman! Healing! Chalice! Womb! Water! Earth-connection! and all that just put me right off. The book wasn’t interesting enough to overcome that.
I did really enjoy Pegasus though. Proof that good characterization and interesting world-building, can overcome a wealth of potential cheese factor. It also read like she toned down her tendency to go all Myffic and vague, which I quite appreciated. The Myffic, portentious endings can be super-effective (Deerskin, Sunshine) or obnoxiously repetitive (Dragonhaven) but was integrated pretty well into the story in this book. Looking forward to the sequel tons.
Is this a good place to bring up my problems with the ending of Spindle’s End, which I would love to have explained to me at length, with short words, possibly some diagrams, and a lot of justification so I can carry my love for the beginning and middle of the book through to the last page?
NicoleF: I keep thinking I will re-read Spindle’s End and write about it because this time I will understand what’s going on. I love the beginning of that book passionately…
Oh, goodness, it’s comforting to see others who love McKinley but weren’t sold on either Chalice or Dragonhaven. I feel somehow disloyal for not utterly loving all of her books.
I read Pegasus right about when I read Blackout, as many readers probably did, and it struck me as terribly unfair to McKinley that her book, unlike Blackout, wasn’t clearly marked as the first half of the story, so that readers who read the book but didn’t read about the book were jarred and disappointed by what seemed like an abrupt and unsatisfying ending.
I read this book on a Friday night. Now, I’m an Orthodox Jew, so I can’t use a computer from Friday night to Saturday night. And then I get to the end of Pegasus, which I liked very much… and I can’t check if there are any plans for a sequel for 18 hours.
I hadn’t been that livid over the ending of a book since I spent a night reading my cousin’s copy of Jodi Picoult’s Handle With Care by accident. I spent the entire Sabbath torn between dread that the abrupt ending was it, and furious plans to fly to England for the sole purpose of punching Robin McKinley in the face if it was.
I would point out to Imitorar @15 that punching anyone is frowned on and punching an author over a book is ALSO frowned on and punching an author over the ending of a book is counter-productive AND frowned on.
I would guess that you would not actually punch anyone. Which makes it hyperbole and uncomfortable, and not conducive to civil discourse.
I love McKinley’s books, and am waiting untl the second half comes out.
Sounds interesting. I may give it a try when the sequel comes out in 2014 (according to her web site).
I like the earlier McKinley much better than the later, and gave up reading her after Rose Daughter. I didn’t care for it or Deerskin. The stuff before that I thought was quite good.
The bit that made me really want to throw the book with great force into a corner? even though I agree with a bunch of the above review? There is a wizard named Fthoom. FTHOOM.
Please, someone, tell me this is McKinley’s placeholder, left in the text by accident, meant to stay there just until she thought of the wizard’s real name. Please.