Skip to content

Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell: “The Friends of English Magic”

11
Share

Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell: “The Friends of English Magic”

Home / Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell: “The Friends of English Magic”
Movies & TV television reviews

Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell: “The Friends of English Magic”

A review of the first episode of Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell, a BBC television show adapted from Susanna Clarke's novel.

By

Published on May 19, 2015

11
Share

The BBC has adapted Susanna Clarke’s Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell into a seven-part series, bringing magic back to England and giving a renowned book a live adaptation. Pilot episodes are often rough things, but when you only have seven tries to get your world across it’s important to make a great impression.

Unfortunately, this premiere offering is too crammed with information to be coherent, and perhaps too timid as well.

It is telling that when this television series was first ordered, it was set at six episodes and then stretched to seven. For those who know the source material that the show is based on, it’s not difficult to imagine why–the book is massive and meticulous, and there is a great deal of information to be imparted for the reader to get the true impact of the tale. Sadly, this first episode—”The Friends of English Magic”—reads most of the time like pure exposition, and hurriedly exposition at that, setting up the rest of the show in such a blur that it’s a wonder newcomers to the tale will understand the subtleties of it at all.

Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell, episode one

For example, the elusive Raven King’s role in the story is mentioned through prophecy and the like, but the dialogue is so hurried that it’s hard to grasp precisely what anyone is so concerned over. Paul Kaye (of Game of Thrones fame) is the primary conduit of prophecy in the role of haggard street magician Vinculus… and he seems to be doing an impression of Captain Jack Sparrow for how he recites his lines and staggers about. Norrell’s purpose in moving to London and offering his services as a magician to the government is sort of blurted out, and suddenly he is there. The first episode essentially encompasses the majority of the first volume of the book, where all the groundwork is laid.

The special effects are beautifully done, the locales immaculate, the costumes and score carefully considered. Norrell’s act of practical magic in Yorkshire, which becomes a springboard for his move to London, is one of the most arresting points of the episode, watching statuary come to life and frighten the fakes and scholars of magic. In design, there is very little to fault with the production. But there’s a dulness to the surroundings that doesn’t feel necessary; it has been popular for some time to cover everything in history with a stubborn layer of mud on film, but the lack of color almost has the show reading like an older BBC adaptation, the lack of contrast making it harder to focus on what needs attention.

Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell, episode one

The characters are quite like the show’s color palette; everything seems to have been toned down and throttled back. The entire story is being cast in a tone of grays and browns. (We have been made to expect that of historical dramas by and large, but one might have hoped that the use of alternate history in the story would allow the filmmakers to deviate a bit.) While Eddie Marsan does an excellent job in his portrayal of Mr. Norrell, the character himself seems to have been calmed into a socially awkward academic, rather than the haughty miserly old fellow that fans of the book might expect. It’s unfortunate because in places where Marsan is allowed to fully communicate Norrell’s difficulty in the company of others, he’s instantly riveting.

Enzo Cilenti’s Childermass and Marc Warren as the Gentleman with the Thistle-Down Hair really steal this episode. The cadence of Cilenti’s voice is vaguely hypnotic, and he plays the character with such a quiet confidence that it’s hard to dismiss him even when he is playing the fringes of a scene. He is wickedly expressive without distending into pantomime, and has the tall order of being responsible for driving everything in this episode forward. Marc Warren looks as though he leapt directly from the page to the television, perfectly designed with a demeanor to match. His ethereal body language should make everyone very excited to see more of the land of faerie.

Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell, episode one

Much as I hate to say it, I’m not really sold on Bertie Carvel’s take on Jonathan Strange just yet. Like Norrell, it seems as though Strange has been toned down at the start–maybe with the intention of allowing the character to build steam and grandeur as he goes forward in the plot. But it means that in this first episode, he lacks the charisma to really demand attention. While the character is meant to be a bit lost early in his journey, he should still be intriguing, still demand our interest. Carvel’s first episode sees Strange as little more than a distracted mess. Everything that occurs around him seems to be an anticlimax, a drawback from the action we’re meant to focus on. (This might be a structural issue, as the inter-cuts of Norrell and Strange’s journeys are practically neck and neck in the show, whereas the book takes time to introduce us to Strange.)

The story seems to find its footing when Norrell comes to the aid of Sir Walter Pole, following the untimely death of his bride-to-be, but that is only the last ten minutes of an episode that has already had fifty, so it’s not really enough. It’s possible that the show will get the ground under it in following episodes as we see more of the world that Susanna Clarke created. But if the show continues to charge through and mutter the plot at us while it passes by, it’s going to be hard to get the kind of enjoyment out of the series that the book provided. The atmosphere is there, the cast is clearly on board, but the story needs a little space. It seems as though it might have needed more like ten episodes, or thirteen, to truly comes across.

Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell, episode one

All of this is mere speculation at a taste of the whole bottle of wine, of course. You can’t judge an entire show by its pilot, so there’s hope that Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell will outstrip this initial gallivant. It doesn’t seem inclined to deviate very much from its source material—which is not a problem at all—but perhaps it could take its time to initiate those who know nothing of text it was ripped from.

Emmet Asher-Perrin could not believe how quickly that hour went by. You can bug her on Twitter and Tumblr, and read more of her work here and elsewhere.

About the Author

Emmet Asher-Perrin

Author

Emmet Asher-Perrin is the News & Entertainment Editor of Reactor. Their words can also be perused in tomes like Queers Dig Time Lords, Lost Transmissions: The Secret History of Science Fiction and Fantasy, and Uneven Futures: Strategies for Community Survival from Speculative Fiction. They cannot ride a bike or bend their wrists. You can find them on Bluesky and other social media platforms where they are mostly quiet because they'd rather talk to you face-to-face.
Learn More About Emmet
Subscribe
Notify of
Avatar


11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Avatar
Knotwise
9 years ago

I was thoroughly pleased with the first episode.  If the rest of the series is like the first episode it’ll go down as one of the most faithful fantasy-novel-adaptations ever put to screen.  Honeyfoot and Segundus felt a little different to me from their book-counterparts, but all the rest of cast was spot-on, and the effects and cinematography are gorgeous.

I was also really happy they kicked things off with the shot of a raven.  I was hoping they would.

Avatar
Knotwise
9 years ago

Are you sure Paul Kaye was in Sherlock?  I don’t see that listed among his credits.  He was in Game of Thrones, however.

Avatar
9 years ago

I was also very pleased, but I’d just reread the book, so it was fresh in my mind.To the best of my memory, it followed the book pretty closely (though I think Strange appears earlier, understandably).

Avatar
9 years ago

Honestly, I thought the Thistledown Gentleman was the weakest link.  It’s Mark Warren doing what Mark Warren does, which he does well, but it’s not the Thistledown Gentleman.  There is nothing capricious or terrifyingly whimsical about this interpretation.  His carelessness with mortal lives is what is meant to be scary, not his actual attempts to be scary. His complete obliviousness to life and death and what hurts us and why individual mortals could possibly even matter is what freaked me out about the character, his inhabiting a totally different reality in his brain — not his ability to loom and intimidate. There is little difference here between this character and Warren’s Rochefort from the Musketeers so far.  I don’t see that changing — I can seen Warren doing a scary face, but can’t see him capturing a smile that’s open and careless enough to be scary, and while I can see him beguiling people against their will, I can’t see people being drawn to him (like, for example, the Maid of Allendale). His look/costuming etc works, however.

I enjoyed the episode a great deal otherwise, though I agree — it’s gonna be hard to cover everything in the number of episodes they’ve given themselves.

Avatar
9 years ago

I am really anxious to see how the relationship between the Gentleman and Stephen works out in the adaption. So far we have seen nothing but pure menace from the Gentleman and I cannot imagine him taking a liking to Stephen the way he does in the book.

Avatar
Knotwise
9 years ago

Honestly, I thought the Thistledown Gentleman was the weakest link.  It’s Mark Warren doing what Mark Warren does, which he does well, but it’s not the Thistledown Gentleman.  There is nothing capricious or terrifyingly whimsical about this interpretation.  His carelessness with mortal lives is what is meant to be scary, not his actual attempts to be scary. His complete obliviousness to life and death and what hurts us and why individual mortals could possibly even matter is what freaked me out about the character, his inhabiting a totally different reality in his brain — not his ability to loom and intimidate.

I do think you’re right that Marc Warren’s performance is missing the humor and whimsy of the character. That stated, after so many years of fairies being portrayed as Tinker-bell-like in mainstream films, I’m happy that we’re finally getting an onscreen portrayal of fairies that shows how dangerous and often unsettling they were in older stories.  I agree with Tymor: it will be very interesting to see this interpretation of the Gentleman interacting with Stephen Black.

 

Avatar
Raw Horse
9 years ago

It’s not a pilot, it’s the first episode; or is this a coinage that I’ve missed?

Avatar
Brownlee
9 years ago

Couldn’t disagree more, and I’m really disappointed to see such a poor review for what was an excellent and charming start to the adaptation of one of my favourite novels. I watched this with people who have never read the book and they had zero issues following it. And it wasn’t a pilot, it was the first episode in a 7-part adaptation, all filmed together. Get your facts straight.

Avatar
yoruneko
9 years ago

What kind of production values are we expecting here? Everything is perfect and the casting is glorious. The book is very slow to setup its story, but a seven part tv show has no time to lose and they hurried things up beautifully and smartly.

This is british TV to it’s uttermost best and we should celebrate it as such, dancing the night away in the gloomy corridors of Lost-Hope.

 

Avatar
9 years ago

The first episode is the weakest (although I thought it was still pretty good). It gets much, much better.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined