Skip to content

We All Agree that Mad Max: Fury Road is Great. Here’s Why It’s Also Important.

44
Share

We All Agree that Mad Max: Fury Road is Great. Here’s Why It’s Also Important.

Home / We All Agree that Mad Max: Fury Road is Great. Here’s Why It’s Also Important.
Movies & TV Mad Max: Fury Road

We All Agree that Mad Max: Fury Road is Great. Here’s Why It’s Also Important.

Mad Max uses action to tell a story of surprising power and depth.

By

Published on May 20, 2015

44
Share
Mad Max: Fury Road

Mad Max: Fury Road premiered to an avalanche of praise, with an astonishingly high Rotten Tomatoes score, an even higher IMDB score (it’s already at #23!), and nigh unanimous praise from everyone from The New Yorker to The Hollywood Reporter to The Mary Sue, with SBNation getting it best (I think) by saying that “Mad Max: Fury Road is a Movie Made with Caps Lock On.” Quite right. Many people also noted the film’s feminism and the environmental themes. But here was one thing I noticed: even in reviews that were a little more in-depth, many of them didn’t actually dig into what makes this film important, and how it is a giant step forward for the Mad Max series–a trilogy that seemed to go out with a hilariously over-the-top bang in 1985.

I want to take a closer look at why this film is so resonant. Spoilers abound for all the Mad Maxes (obviously) and for Thelma & Louise (come on, you’ve had, like, 50 years to watch it) and Game of Thrones (ugh). This post will discuss sexual violence, so tread carefully if you need to.

Multiple reviews referred to the film as “thin.” I would disagree–first, Miller is telling a symbolic story, not a linear one. That story happens to be about war and its aftermath, slavery, the objectification of human beings, and PTSD. The medium he uses to tell this story happens to be an action movie, more specifically a car chase. However, an interesting underlying subtext of the film is how Miller takes our expectations and subverts them. We hear “action movie” and we think San Andreas. We hear “car chase” and we think Fast and Furious. But what Miller does is practice a kind of pure action cinema. He treats a car chase movie as though it’s a 70s kung fu film, or 90s Hong Kong crime story. He’s telling a story essentially through action. When I said in my review that I thought Fury Road was one of the best films of the year, my reasoning was that it was one of the best films I’ve ever seen that took grief and trauma and, through the alchemy of George Miller’s kinetic action sequences, turned the healing process itself into an enjoyable movie.

The most effective way to talk about just how revolutionary this film is go through the various character arcs, beginning with “The Wives.”

Mad Max: Fury Road

The Wives (The Splendid Angharad, Toast the Knowing, Capable, The Dag, Cheedoh the Fragile):

A thousand years ago, in 1991, a movie called Thelma and Louise came out. It was touted as a feminist action movie, a rare notable occasion when women got to have all the fun and carnage usually reserved for male action stars. There were two BIG differences in T&L’s story, though. First, their “adventure” starts with a rape; Thelma, having escaped her borderline abusive husband for a girls’ weekend with Louise, is attacked by a random guy at a bar. Louise, luckily, finds them and points her gun at the guy.

Louise: In the future, when a woman’s crying like that, she isn’t having any fun!
Harlan: Bitch! I shoulda gone ahead and fucked her!
Louise: Why did you say?
Harlan: I said suck my cock.

She shoots him. Thus begins their road trip, as they go on the lam knowing that no court is going to buy “self-defense” when everyone in the bar saw Thelma drinking and dancing with the guy. As they plan their run across the South, Thelma tries to route them through Texas, but Louise refuses to go, and says she’ll never go back there. Thelma tries to ask why, but Louise won’t talk about it, and Thelma drops it. We never learn what happened to her, but given her intricate knowledge of rape prosecution… we can guess.

What’s the second big difference? Their adventure ends in suicide. And not a big, Armageddon-y sacrifice/suicide–they know they can’t get to Mexico, and they know they’ll never get a fair trial, so they decide it’s better to die than go to prison.

Now let’s get to Fury Road. Several reviewers chose to single out the freed women’s introduction, with one referring to the group as “a pampered harem of willowy model types…” before going on to comment on “the high level of wowza on display” and then going on to describe the scene as showing the women “in skimpy, shorty, filmy dresses, hosing one another off in lyrical semi-slow motion.” The (enthusiastic and positive) New Yorker review also dwells on this scene: “Our first glimpse of them bodes ill: limber beauties, draped in muslin underwear and hosing themselves down in the middle of nowhere. It’s like the start of a Playboy shoot…” before stating that the film “recovers” from this scene by focusing on the Vuvalini biker gang later on.

Now, forgive me for being po-faced, but the women being described are all rape victims. They’ve been crammed into a tiny, hot, waterless space under a tanker truck in order to escape their rapist. At least two of them are pregnant with their rapist’s babies. They’re not a “pampered harem”–they’re prisoners, who are risking their lives to escape sexual slavery and give their children a different life. And look at the scene again: Max doesn’t focus on the women; his attention is on the water. Water is even more precious than gasoline in this version of Mad Max (a fact underscored later on when Max washes his bloodied face with breastmilk) and they have a whole hose of it. To go even further, Miller is showing us a scene that could be sexy in the way these review describe–models in see-through clothes spraying water on each other, with the water a stand-in for a different liquid substance. But Miller subverts every aspect of that cliché. In this case the hose full of water is just a hose full of water–the most precious thing they could have in the Waste. The diaphanous dresses are their prison uniforms. (Given that no one else in the film is dressed like this, I think it’s safe to assume that these are the clothes required by Immortan Joe.) And what is the first thing they do after Furiosa lets them out? The most important thing? Even as they’re drinking water they take turns freeing each other from hideous chastity belts, reclaiming their bodies. They are no longer things, they are not a fucking harem, and they are not Joe’s slaves. The Splendid Angharad drives this home by using her pregnant belly as a shield later on, using Joe’s own child against him as he tries to shoot Max and Furiosa. Capable (played by Riley Keough) chooses to reach out to damaged War Boy Nux, comforting him with her formerly untouchable body.

FuriosaScreaming

Furiosa

Game of Thrones enraged a lot of people last Sunday when Sansa was raped by her new husband, Ramsay Bolton. Having avoided a nightmarish marriage to Joffrey, having received respect from her husband Tyrion, and having learned to maneuver around people more powerful than her, she has now become another one of the show’s many, many rape victims. This is used as an end of episode plot twist, a moment for the show to go off-book again, and to throw new abuse at one of the most abused characters. This will now almost certainly be her defining moment of the season–this, not the moment she declared herself Sansa Stark of Winterfell. Now here’s the utterly worst part of this Sansa plot–as several reviewers have pointed out, the camera cuts to Theon’s face. It doesn’t even stay on Sansa to record her experience, and keep this horrible scene about her and how it fits into her larger story–it makes her rape part of Theon’s story, part of his redemption.

Now, let compare how George Miller treats Furiosa. After she reunites with The Many Mothers, we learn that her own mother died “on the third day”–presumably the third day after being kidnapped by Immortan Joe or his agents. It’s safe to assume that terrible things were being done to Furiosa and her mother during the trek back to the Citadel. Furiosa survived them, her mother did not. Furiosa then spent the next 20-odd years working for the man who stole her from her home, eventually becoming an Imperator. When Furiosa learns that her home is truly gone, she walks away a few feet to collapse and howl out her grief. This howl exactly mirrors Max’s collapse when he finds his murdered wife and child in the original Mad Max. Now, in a lesser film, he would comfort her, tell her the story of his loss, take her moment away from her. But no–we stay on her for this. We spend one of the few still moments in the movie watching her terrible grief from a polite distance with Max. And it’s only about a half an hour (and roughly three thousand explosions) later that Max gently takes the story back from her…but more on that in a minute.

When Furiosa finally kills the shit out of Immortan Joe, his death is framed in terms of her experience. She’s the one we watch crawling through the truck. She finally faces him, and in two words, (“Remember me?”) Charlize Theron tells us the other half of her story. We’ve already seen what she lost. Now, we get a glimpse of what her life was after she was stolen from their home.

NuxandCapable

Nux

Max is haunted by his past, and turned into nothing more than a body by Immortan Joe. But here’s the key: in the opening scenes we root for him against the powdered boys who are attacking him. As the chase begins we are rooting for him and Furiosa, and cheer as War Boys bite it. I went in blind, so I assumed Nux was dead after the crash, and thought that Miller was going for the sick joke of Max being tied to a corpse for half the movie. But no–Nux wakes up. So then I thought he was going to be the secondary antagonist, clinging to the truck and striking at Furiosa and the women from within. But no–after he fails to assassinate Furiosa and humiliates himself in front of Joe, he’s just a kid. A traumatized, enslaved kid who’s been duped into craving Joe’s approval over all else. He loses his reason for living when he fails, and has to remake himself on the run, just as the women are. Just as Max is. As the chase continues, more and more of his paints fades away, until we see the real face underneath. And this comes to mean even more as the cars continue to explode: under the paint and the war cries, every boy on those trucks is a kid just like Nux. All the drummers. Coma-Doof. Even the horrible Rictus Erectus manages to sound sweet and vulnerable as he shares the news of his brother. Miller has subverted the story again: other than Joe (and possibly The Bullet Farmer and The People Eater…), there aren’t really any villains here.

And then he takes that a step further as well. Nux has been trained to live for a fiery death, and he gets it–but he gets it on his own new terms. Having experienced something like real love with Capable, he sacrifices himself to kill Rictus and save the woman he was maybe starting to hope he had a future with. This is terrible, and I felt it more than any of the other deaths in the film, but it also allows him to transform his destiny. Rather than being a slave to Joe’s war machine, he is a free and independent young man who sacrifices himself for others by his own choice.

madmaxfuryroadtop

Max

Some have complained that Max is along for the ride, but this is in keeping with the trilogy. In the first film he isn’t even introduced for about ten minutes, and we get plenty of long Max-less scenes with his wife and Toecutter’s gang. The Road Warrior is narrated by Feral Kid, and again we get lots of scenes of Humungus’ gang, Papagallo’s people, and the Gyrocopter captain. In the end, Max is revealed to be a decoy–a fact that seemingly everyone knew but him. Pappagallo cooked up a plan to get his people to safety, and used Max, knowing he’d be in mortal danger, and that, if Max lived (a big fucking if) he’d be abandoned in the Waste with no ride. He didn’t ask Max to sacrifice himself, he played on Max’s pride in order to use him. In Thunderdome, we again get plenty of Max-free scenes, and in the end we learn that our hero has been used again, this time by two different leaders who are working to different ends. At least Max is able to choose to sacrifice himself to allow the kids to escape, but that’s only after he’s been pushed into an impossible situation. Again, he’s left at the end of the film, in the Waste, with no ride, and Savannah Nix gets the ending narration to wrap the story up for us.

Now, in Fury Road, Max gets to narrate his own story for the first time, and he chooses to help the women in the end. His name is taken away again, but this time he doesn’t even rate “Raggedy Man” or “The Man with No Name”–he is reduced to his function, and called “Blood Bag.” He refuses to give Furiosa his name when she asks for it. So she calls him “Fool.” After they make it to the Vuvalini, Furiosa gives him a bike and precious supplies that she could have kept for herself, and tells him he’s welcome to come with them across the salt flats. This is the first time in the series that he’s given a reasonable choice. After some thought, he decides to suggest going back and storming the Citadel–which in itself is interesting–and he and Furiosa shake hands on the deal, marking the first time Max is able to be truly, fairly partnered with someone, a fellow hero. And then Miller subverts heroism.

Furiosa is terribly wounded during the storm on the Citadel, and is clearly dying. Given all the other deaths in the film I figured this was it for her, and she’d be the grand sacrificial figure. Instead, Max tells her his name–which I think marks the first time in the series that he’s chosen to tell someone his name?–and then, like Nux, takes the role Immortan Joe forced on him and transforms it into something better. Having been turned into a Blood Bag against his will, he chooses to give his blood to Furiosa, and the thing that seemed like just a sick joke/dystopian objectification at the beginning of the film is turned into an act of healing. He is doing it purely to save her, but in doing it makes a new connection to humanity, and to the better part of himself, just as Nux did in his sacrifice. He becomes a hero through this healing act, not through fighting.

Mad Max: Fury Road

The Many Mothers, The Milk Mothers, and the State of Fertility

Finally, the last subversion comes in the definition of fertility. Immortan Joe believes that by forcing healthy young women to bear his children, he’ll re-populate the world with perfect children. He has women hooked up to machines to steal their milk, presumably for his own use, and that of his future children. (I hate to even ask this question, but where are their children?) The only one of Joe’s children that we see dies with his mother, The Splendid Angharad, who died in a terrible inversion of the murder of Max’s wife and child. The Mary Sue pointed out how horrific this scene is, as one of Joe’s men performs a postmortem C-section on Splendid, but as Emmet Asher-Perrin said as we left the theater, “That bastard never got to touch the baby.” Which is true, and I think the best way to read the scene: as Splendid had hoped, Immortan Joe doesn’t get to have any interaction with her child, and as terrible as their deaths are, she succeeded in protecting Max and Furiosa, freeing her fellow slaves, and keeping her child out of the hands of the monster who would have turned him into a warlord.

Joe’s fantasy of a new and fertile world is ultimately remade by the Vuvalini–the women he raided for slaves during Furiosa’s childhood. As a Forbes article points out, the Vuvalini end up paying the most in the siege of the Citadel:

Indeed, it’s the Many Mothers who end up paying the ultimate price. Max and Furiosa drive out to where the old ladies have built a decent, if hard, life for themselves. They gather them up and take them back to the Citadel, and almost all of them are killed in the process.

In Road Warrior, many of the Outpost’s survivors also die. Their leader. Warrior Woman. Almost every single one. But it was their escape, and Max was simply aiding them in it. Here we have a secondary, grey-haired group take all the bullets so that the young, pretty women can survive.

Which is a good point—I also wished more of them made it. But I would disagree that this is what the Vuvalini died for. They had been traveling through the Waste looking for fertile ground to replant, and now they knew that the seeds they’d been carrying in impossible hope would be planted and given a chance to live. By giving them to The Dag, the Keeper of the Seeds managed to ensure her plants would live after her own death.

When they return to the Citadel, the Milk Mothers have freed themselves from the machines to cheer Furiosa, and within a few moments, Furiosa sends water down to the people below. The fertility Joe hoped for has been transubstantiated into something better—seeds, freely given by their keeper, which will yield a new world.

And finally…

Much as silent film used to be able to reach across cultures and languages, Miller’s focus on action and emotion over dialogue and exposition allows us to experience the story in a direct, intimate way. The people who referred to this film as a “Trojan Horse” were completely correct—but Miller wasn’t smuggling feminist propaganda, he was disguising a story of healing as a fun summer blockbuster. By choosing to tell a story about how a bunch of traumatized, brainwashed, enslaved, objectified humans reclaim their lives as a balls-out feminist car chase epic with occasional moments of twisted humor, George Miller has subverted every single genre, and given us a story that will only gain resonance with time.

Leah Schnelbach hopes to one day rock as hard as Coma Doof Warrior. Come talk to her on Twitter!

About the Author

Leah Schnelbach

Author

Intellectual Junk Drawer from Pittsburgh.
Learn More About Leah
Subscribe
Notify of
Avatar


44 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Avatar
9 years ago

The manosphere must be even more crazy now.

 

Avatar
9 years ago

@1 No, they’re proclaiming victory because an R rated action movie only brought in $40 million, domestically(another $65 mil overseas).  If you look at R Rate action movie rankings on Box Office Mojo, it’s like the 7th highest opening weekend following The Matrix Reloaded, 300, Watchmen, Wanted, The Matrix Revolutions, Troy, and Bad Boys II.  Not bad for a franchise that’s been dead for 30 years. 

Avatar
Brian
9 years ago

I loved the article, but just one comment: we do see at least one more of Joe’s children.  When Splendid dies the huge muscley dude in the latex mask who is always with Joe mourns that he has lost a perfect brother.  I assumed that meant he was Joe’s kid.

Avatar
9 years ago

@2  A total girl movie was number one though!

Here’s a take on the movie that isn’t as impressed by its feminism cred.

Avatar
Heather
9 years ago

Excellent article. I would also like to see this viewpoint applied to Dredd 2012, a criminally under-appreciated action flick. I would argue that, much as in Mad Max, the true focus of that movie isn’t on Judge Dredd, but on Anderson and Ma Ma, who are excellently written female characters.

Avatar
edgewalker
9 years ago

Game of Thrones enraged a lot of people last Sunday when Sansa was raped by her new husband, Ramsay Bolton. Having avoided a nightmarish marriage to Joffrey, having received respect from her husband Tyrion, and having learned to maneuver around people more powerful than her, she has now become another one of the show’s many, many rape victims. This is used as an end of episode plot twist, a moment for the show to go off-book again, and to throw new abuse at one of the most abused characters. This will now almost certainly be her defining moment of the season–this, not the moment she declared herself Sansa Stark of Winterfell. Now here’s the utterly worst part of this Sansa plot–as several reviewers have pointed out, the camera cuts to Theon’s face. It doesn’t even stay on Sansa to record her experience, and keep this horrible scene about her and how it fits into her larger story–it makes her rape part of Theon’s story, part of his redemption.”

 

This whole paragraph is not what I got out of this scene.

Sansa has learned how to maneuver around people with more power, but she needs to get power herself to get Winterfell back in Stark hands. How can she do this? By marrying Ramsey. She knew exactly what she was doing. Even when that lady in the bath tried to scare her off with stories about Ramsey’s atrocities, she stood firm in her resolve. She did what she felt was necessary.

As for focusing on Theon, he is also a victim here, but that was meant to spare us the sight of Sansa’s pain. It’s enough to hear it. Had they stayed on her face, the outcry would have been about them sexualizing her rape.

Other than that, great article. Really well-written.

Braid_Tug
9 years ago

@6:  I think you meant to post this on a different thread.

Avatar
9 years ago

– Yes. That is Rictus and he is Immortal Joe’s son.

Great review. This is my new favorite movie.  I loved the original trilogy but Fury Road even more. Only thing better then a great action movie is an action movie that subtly sneaks in a deep meaningful message.

Did anyone else think that the film looked like Royo painting? Especially The Wives. 

Avatar
Ragnarredbeard
9 years ago

“In the end, Max is revealed to be a decoy–a fact that seemingly everyone knew but him. “

 

I beg to differ.  In both Road Warrior and Thunderdome we see Max making the sacrifice for the greater good.  In RW its to be the decoy so the others get away.  In TD he clears the way so the plane can get airborne.  In both cases he makes a conscious decision to not share the future with those he helps. 

Avatar
Edgewalker
9 years ago

Her thoughts on this take up a large paragraph. I posted it exactly where I meant to.

Avatar
KF
9 years ago

@9: I think she means a decoy in the sense that he thought he was actually hauling the gasoline. It’s pretty clear from his reaction after the chase that he didn’t realize what was really in the tanker.

Avatar
9 years ago

Great article. I love that it stands on its own as a great action movie, a visual and auditory spectacle, but also manages to work in all of this subtext.

And yes, Max in The Road Warrior had no idea he was the diversion.

Avatar
Paris green
9 years ago

1. Yes the milk mothers have children, one of them is dandling a baby on her lap in the opening scenes. From the affection I assumed it was hers Although no proof.

2. The Milk Mothers released the water in the closing scene not Furiosa. I thought that was more symbolically pleasing than Furiosa doing it anyway.

Avatar
S
9 years ago

#6- Thanks edgewalker. I read the scene the same way —  the way episode, (with its “previously on” flashbacks showing Sansa’s decisions & ability to escape Bolton) clearly wanted to be read. Sansa’s out for vengeance, and she’s willing to be brutalized by a psychopath to get it.

Nice analysis of the Mad Max film, Leah.

Avatar
Adam-Troy Castro
9 years ago

I differ with one major point, here. In THE ROAD WARRIOR, Pappagallo was actually *perfectly willing* to take Max along with the others, if he survived the final chase. How do we know this? Simple; first, Pappagallo rides up alongside Max and tells him, prematurely, as it turns out,  “We’ve won.” This is a rather strong indication that he thinks Max has proved his worth and done his part and one of “we.” (Also, it’s pretty hard to believe that Papagallo would be so chummy with a guy he was about to abandon in the desert; but we can skip that debate in lieu of point number two). Point number two: after the chase, the Gyro Captain DOES go along with the community. He gets his reward. And they have known him exactly as long as they’ve known Max; he has become one of them by fighting for them. Why would they give this to the Gyro Captain and not Max? The only possible explanation, really, is that during the same conversation where the Captain was invited along,Max did what Max does and said no.

Avatar
Brian C
9 years ago

@13 regarding the Milk Mothers’ babies – re-watched the film yesterday noticed that at least one of the babies being held is a mummified corpse. Just when that scene can’t get any creepier… it does.

Avatar
Violet
9 years ago

Immortan Joe actually has two sons, besides Angharad’s fetus. Rictus Erectus is one and Corpus Colossus, the dwarf who’s watching everything through telescopes, is the other. One son is physically strong but mentally disabled and the other is physically disabled. He’s trying to go for a “pure” son who’s not mutated by the radiation that has made Joe and his warboys ill.

Avatar
mirana
9 years ago

Though I hated to see us lose so many of the Vuvalini, I assumed the theme Miller was going for was the old fighting and giving way for the young to survive.

Avatar
SDG
9 years ago

This is among the best pieces I’ve seen yet on this film (and I’ve read quite a few). One asterisk: 

The diaphanous dresses are their prison uniforms. (Given that no one else in the film is dressed like this, I think it’s safe to assume that these are the clothes required by Immortan Joe.) 

The same could be said of Return of the Jedi‘s infamous “Slave Leia” outfit, which is widely regarded as objectifying. I’m not saying a defense can’t be mounted for the depiction of the Five Wives, but I’m not sure it’s possible to entirely dismiss any level of cheesecake in their introductory scene in particular.

Of course it’s possible to offer a diegetic rationale for their attire; it would also be possible to offer a diegetic rationale for why they might have been more covered up. Clearly their escape has been planned for some time, and as it gets cold in the desert they can’t have nothing else to wear; even if they do, Furiosa could have provided them with attire appropriate for eye-catching women traveling through hostile terrain where anything might happen and anyone might be encountered.

The fact that Miller cast five actresses who are all models, all gorgeous and all willowy, can also be rationalized diegetically; obviously Joe wants the healthiest and most desirable breeders. But when you put models onscreen in diaphanous attire and introduce them in slow motion, it’s hard to say you aren’t catering to the male gaze at all. 

Avatar
9 years ago

@SDG – I think Miller made them look sexy to prove a point. The first time we see them, its very sexual. They are very attractive, made even more so by comparison. In fact they are like the only truly beautiful people in the movie and a very ugly world. But despite this, when Max – sees them in all their hot and wet, sexyness -not to mention, God only knows that last time Max has had been with a women, probably not since his wife died- all he cares about is the water.

Basically,  in this world, sex, and probably love, is a luxury that only someone as powerful as Immortal Joe can afford. (I doubt there is even much procreation going on at all,  Procreation is definitely controlled under Immortal Joe’s rule.) Things have not yet moved past survival mode for everyone except the most powerful.

Avatar
SDG
9 years ago

@@@@@ kid_greg: 

I don’t dispute any of that — but we could have seen them as Max sees them without the slow-mo intro as they climb out of the truck. Max isn’t even looking at them at that point. That’s clearly about the audience’s gaze, not Max’s gaze.

You can claim that Miller appeals to the male gaze in order to subvert it through Max’s disinterest, but he’s still appealing to the male gaze. They’re still being objectified. Even if we say they’re being objectified in order to subvert the objectification, I don’t think we can exclude a cake-and-eating-it-too dynamic. 

Avatar
RobotsPJs
9 years ago

“You can claim that Miller appeals to the male gaze in order to subvert it through Max’s disinterest, but he’s still appealing to the male gaze. They’re still being objectified. Even if we say they’re being objectified in order to subvert the objectification, I don’t think we can exclude a cake-and-eating-it-too dynamic. “‘

In order to subvert expectations, you pretty much have to start with what is being subverted to begin with. How could an artist possibly play with audience expectations otherwise?

 

Avatar
9 years ago

Sorry, but the target that the The Road Warrior hit, Fury Road missed, and missed wide. The setup was far too patchy for me to actually get invested. If the story had begun sooner, with us seeing Furiosa interacting with the breeders and planning their escape, and in the process making their plight less abstract, and setting up safe passage, and earning the trust needed to drive a war-rig, and only then, having built up the suspense (and our interest), showing us the rescue attempt – then they might have had a chance of hitting the mark. Unfortunately, though, they started in the wrong place, and Fury Road just lacks the true magic that The Road Warrior has.

Cheers,

zdrakec

Avatar
Jake
9 years ago

“Instead, Max tells her his name–which I think marks the first time in the series that he’s chosen to tell someone his name?”

He tells someone his name in Beyond Thunderdome, although it’s played as a brief moment of humor:

Master:  Who you?

Max:  Me Max.

Avatar
Lara
9 years ago

I didn’t see the introduction scene of The Wives as objectifying at all – I think that perhaps a lot of viewers are so conditioned to immediately think that any scene of an attractive woman who isn’t fully covered must necessarily be sexual and existing for the male gaze – a viewpoint that I personally disagree with.

As for the Milk Mothers, I was a bit shocked in the moment of their establishing shot but I’m fairly certain I saw at least one of them holding a tiny, dead infant – the implications of which are horrifying on so many levels. The Milk Mothers are what I found the most upsetting in the entire movie.

Avatar
9 years ago

@5 I’m with you on the Dredd thing – I wrote a lot of rambling blog posts back in 2012 about the character dynamics because that was the last time we got a decent action film with female characters centred like this, and all the reviews at the time just kept whining it was too much like The Raid (aside from some obvious plot similarities, it… really isn’t).

But they have the same attitude to shooting violence in some ways (with the attitude that there are consequences, and the human body is a fragile thing) and you can absolutely see parallels in MaMa and Furiosa actually. Both start in a position of weakness, are disfigured and rise to power within the same system that is controlling them by being capable of great violence – it’s a narrative certainty that Furiosa has done terrible things, but she wants to atone for them by helping the Wives escape.  And MaMa goes in the other direction entirely (but it is interesting how she has practically no interest in Anderson – who basically survives only because MaMa is so lax about killing or torturing her.).

@16 I noticed the dead babies on the second watch too… I wondered if that might be what happens to the girl babies, seeing as there are only Warboys running around the Citadel otherwise (essentially sacrificing girls over boy children, and then having to go and find brides from elsewhere)?

jere7my
jere7my
9 years ago

After a second viewing, I think the “dead babies” are in factdolls, intended to stimulate milk production, which I think is a thing.

Avatar
Chris
9 years ago

I agree with the Dredd comments and to me it is still a very underrated movie. The calls for a second are still out there and hope it comes to, as Karl Urban redeemed Dredd from that horrible 90s version that may have kept a lot away from the newer one.

 

As for Max, I loved the visualzation and a great break from the superhero universe. It is funny some have claimed it is a braindead flick, when as this post has pointed out, you need to use your brain even harder and read into the artistry on display. 

Avatar
9 years ago

@23

With all that added setup, the movie would probably be longer, even if you trimmed some of the later chases. Fury Road is already at two hours, and that’s my only criticism of it. A movie like this needs to be around 90 minutes, like The Road Warrior.

Avatar
Cundalini's Hand
9 years ago

(I hate to even ask this question, but where are their children?)

 

Their children are the war boys.

Avatar
9 years ago

And I’ve just realised Dredd homages the first Mad Max film quite heavily at the start (the way the title characters are first seen is almost identical, followed by a car chase and mention of meat wagons, and there’s even a shot of a Halls of Justice). The plot and characters obviously aren’t that similar, but there’s a definite style/staging influence (which I’ve only just noticed rewatching Mad Max for the first time in ten years…!). 

Avatar
dangus
9 years ago

@23
No. Just not. The movie did not need another hour tacked on the front of exposition. All these things you describe are hinted at, implied or inferred during the course of the movie as it stands. George Miller made the correct choice of not shoving these things down our throats. 

Avatar
Ian Osmond
9 years ago

As far as the Vuvalini go, I was definitely thinking there was a sort of “maiden/mother/crone” thing going on in the whole movie, and one of the things that “crones” might do is act to protect the rest of the community.  And I definitely see the Vuvalini as straight-up heroes BECAUSE they threw themselves into danger when they didn’t have to, and protected and saved the entire community of the Citadel with their lives.

Avatar
Helen
9 years ago

It’s rubbish.

This is what I hate about “SciFi”.

Gives the real stuff a bad name.

 

Avatar
nefj6000
9 years ago

I really enjoyed this post. I wish someone had proofread it first before it was published, because the typo’s were very distracting (“Immortan” Joe… gah!). Otherwise, a great piece.

wiredog
9 years ago

@nefj600

Immortan Joe is the character’s name.

Avatar
9 years ago

@32:

My point is that hinting, inferring, and implying are insufficient. As with any good story, show me, don’t tell me. 

Regards,

zdrakec

Avatar
9 years ago

@37 Um, please don’t take this the wrong way, but I think you’re confusing what ‘show don’t tell’ actually means? This particular film, where all the background information is coded in slang dialogue and production design, is the epitome of ‘show don’t tell’ taken to an extreme.  If this included various long scenes where the characters sat around explaining exactly what happened and how they came to be there… that would be ‘telling’.

There’s not a whole lot of ‘telling’ in Road Warrior either though? I mean, you don’t see or hear all the backstory of the guys in the refinery (who are the equivalent of Furiosa et al), it just gets mentioned in dialogue they have a thing and they’re in a situation. I mean, Max talks a whole lot more in all the previous films, but they’re not really big on expositionary dialogue unless you count Aunty Entity explaining things in Beyond Thunderdome (and the whole thing with the kids)?

I would say go watch this one again (and preferably a third time) and see if it makes a difference. I missed so much information on the first watch just through sensory overload – the second watch was much clearer, there are so many clues in the set design of the Wives’ quarters, and even what you can read of the tattoos Max gets given. The first time I saw it, I came out complaining about the editing not being clear and it being confusing and underwritten, but the bloody thing stuck in my head until I went and saw it again a couple of days later (and now I’m trying to find time to see it a fourth time this week because it’s become one of my all time favourites very quickly).

Avatar
slone13
9 years ago

@@@@@Ragnarredbeard

Max (and the viewer) has NO IDEA the tanker was filled with sand instead of gas at the end of Road Warrior until he sees is pouring out after the wreck. 

Avatar
9 years ago

@34

You think Mad Max is sci-fi? Well, maybe the science of the internal combustion engine is at play, I guess.

Avatar
blake
9 years ago

Amazing article but thorough disagree with your Game of Thrones thing, just because it ended on Theon that doesn’t mean it is any less about Sansa. It is about both of them and both of their rapes, remember Theon has been going through his for a few seasons now, though not conventional like what happened with Sansa but the camera had every right to end of his face too.

Avatar
Tobor68
9 years ago

I got to explain to my Mother-In-Law, a very pious woman, that the final battle involved spear-chucking, motorcycle riding, ass-kicking and name-taking grannies. She seemed pleasantly surprised but in no way motivated to see it. :)

Avatar
9 years ago
Avatar
Colin
8 years ago

Actually both rictus erectus (huge guy) and corpus collosus (small disabled man) are the sons of Joe. Not to mention scabrous scrotus from the. Mad max video game.

Also in the context of the wives “pamperment” as furiosa points out in Furiosa #1 they have problems.but everyone in the wasteland does. While people dehydrate and die they’re taking baths and eating fresh vegetables. 

Nevertheless great article for a great movie.