Skip to content

Why Doesn’t Anyone Like The Lost World: Jurassic Park?

20
Share

Why Doesn’t Anyone Like The Lost World: Jurassic Park?

Home / Why Doesn’t Anyone Like The Lost World: Jurassic Park?
Movies & TV Jurassic Park

Why Doesn’t Anyone Like The Lost World: Jurassic Park?

By

Published on June 10, 2015

20
Share

I maintain that if The Lost World was not automatically pitted against Jurassic Park by virtue of being its sequel, people probably would have gotten a kick out of it.

That doesn’t change the fact that the movie couldn’t beat its predecessor without blindfolding it, hogtying it, and sending it into the raptor cage first, but come on—there’s nothing wrong with letting Dr. Ian Malcolm carry a film with a baby T-Rex in it. So why all the hostility?

Jurassic Park entranced us for many obvious reasons, but so much of it was bound up in structure, in its conceit. It was frightening because the protagonists were isolated, because they were forced to deal with a threat the likes of which no human being had ever encountered. At the end, everyone is safe but traumatized, and what’s worse, no one in the world knows what has happened to them. Even if we had not found out about the InGen gag order in The Lost World, it’s not exactly difficult to extrapolate that scenario as the helicopters are leaving the island. In that respect, Jurassic Park has all the qualities of a good horror film—no one can hear you scream and they will never know (or believe) what you saw.

lost-world-trex-attack

The problem with The Lost World is that it eliminates that sense of isolation. It is a film that culminates in an homage to King Kong and Godzilla—an unstoppable force coming into hard contact with a modern world that it has no hope of joining. The idea of creating that homage is not terrible in and of itself, it’s just unfortunately handled too tongue-in-cheek to make the kind of impact it had the potential for. Between drinking from swimming pools and goofy shoutouts to Gojira made by a Japanese expat, we cannot take the chills seriously. It doesn’t help that bringing in the outside world automatically takes fear out of the equation; modern weaponry and military force might make it hard to sell the rampage.

On the other hand, if someone had tried to pitch you this screenplay with the words “Tyrannosaurus Rex charging through San Diego,” would you have been able to say no? Let’s be fair here.

lost-world-spielberg

But what about what works in this movie? Taking the funniest character from the first film and handing the reins over to him was a pretty brazen move that paid off in more ways than one. If The Lost World was always destined to be the campy cousin of Jurassic Park, then putting Ian Malcolm center stage guaranteed all the wit and sarcasm that the movie required to make up for every groan. Though arguably the only smart person (smart meaning intelligent and practical) from the first film, that doesn’t mean that he’s necessarily a great guy. The Lost World does a good job of letting us know exactly why Dr. Malcolm is always, as he put it to Dr. Grant, “Looking for a future ex-Mrs. Malcolm.” Half of the enjoyment to be had from the film is all about watching the guy fail at handling every relationship he has, kid included.

I’m going to go out on a limb here and say something that might irritate the Crichton fans out there—this movie succeeds where the Lost World novel failed utterly. It’s strange to realize that the book is actually more Hollywood than the film in this case, particularly in the manner with which it tries to reproduce its past success. The children in The Lost World novel are literally the movie versions of Lex and Tim flipped; this time the boy is a computer whiz and the girl, Kelly Curtis, loves dinosaurs. Instead, the film gives Kelly a real relationship to Malcolm (as his daughter), making her choice to stow away much easier to buy. And while she is similarly situated in the plot to save the day once or twice, she comes off as a wonderfully real teen, though one clearly related to Malcolm—you know the moment she uses words like “troglodyte” to describe a babysitter, and his instant response is, “Cruel, but good word use.” That’s family, right there.

lost-world-cast

The supporting cast of The Lost World frankly sell the film in every place where it falls down: we’ve got Julianne Moore, Vince Vaughn, Richard Schiff, and Pete Postlethwaite, who are all more than capable of picking up narrative slack. It’s impossible for Postlethwaite to be bad at any part he plays, and his hubris is delicious in this film, his insistence that he understands the animals when he really is just another white guy in the jungle. What’s more, I’d argue that the edible members of the journey are actually more likable on this rodeo than in the previous film. (No one wants to defend a “bloodsucking lawyer,” after all.) Julianne Moore as Sarah Harding provides exactly what we didn’t get from Dr. Grant and Dr. Sattler in Jurassic Park; they spent so much of the movie being understandably terrified that we got little chance to see them do what they do best—geek out about dinosaurs. Harding is fun to follow because curiosity outweighs her sense of self-preservation, and that’s what essentially moves the plot forward.

Again, I would like to point out: a woman, who is a scientist, cares so much about said science that she essentially guides us through the whole movie. That alone is reason enough for applause, no matter how much Ian Malcolm wants everyone to believe she’s crazy.

Can we all agree that it’s a mistake he doesn’t appear like this again, though?

 

And at the heart of the film is a deconstruction of what Jurassic Park had worked so hard to build up in our minds. Rather than play the “scary beast” card, we spend The Lost World being made to understand that these big monsters are also protective parents. That what we often find inhuman is all-too-often the opposite if we take the time to look hard enough. It brings back the wonder of John Hammond’s initial concept where the park was concerned. It was meant to be a place that fueled your imagination, that renewed your sense of awe with creation. Sarah Harding’s research, her way of interacting with the dinosaurs is how we would all prefer to interact, not from behind the windows of a theme park-owned car on tracks.

lost-world-trex-baby

For being such a lighthearted take on what Jurassic Park doled out, there are careful reexaminations of themes from the first film and beyond. Again we find Spielberg’s favorite conflict in fathers estranged from their children, but unlike Dr. Grant, who is learning how to be a father to someone else’s children, or Roy Neary from Close Encounters of the Third Kind, who is abandoning his family over a calling and obsession, we see Ian Malcolm learn how to become a better father by being forced to spend this harrowing time with his daughter. Father-daughter relationships get far less screentime in general than fathers and sons, especially rocky ones, so it’s a fresh dynamic. We also see another example of man’s disregard for the power of nature, though this time it is not only John Hammond who refuses to give the proper respect. And the post traumatic stress that Malcolm still clearly struggles with as a result of his time in the park is addressed roundly, making his anger toward everyone who ignores his warnings easy to key into.

lost-world-trex-family

Not to mention that when you break it down, the trip to San Diego offers a very clever twist on that King Kong rehash. What The Lost World chose to do was take Kong, itself a romanticizing of classics like The Hunchback of Notre Dame or The Phantom of the Opera—the hideous, misunderstood man who is shunned by society and denied the woman he loves—and turn it into a story about protective familial love, a completely animal instinct that defines the lives of so many of us. In turn, The Lost World becomes a story that is utterly powered by the motivations of women; a scientist who wants to understand nature, a girl who wants to know her father, a mother—and father, as it is the male T-Rex stomping through California—who will do anything to get their child back.

You know what, all that stuff I said about how goofy this movie is? I take it back. The Lost World is awesome.

This article was originally published March 27, 2013 as part of Tor.com’s Dinosaur Week.

Emmet Asher-Perrin will give the baby t-rex back in just a few minutes, she promises. You can bug her on Twitter and read more of her work here and elsewhere.

About the Author

Emmet Asher-Perrin

Author

Emmet Asher-Perrin is the News & Entertainment Editor of Reactor. Their words can also be perused in tomes like Queers Dig Time Lords, Lost Transmissions: The Secret History of Science Fiction and Fantasy, and Uneven Futures: Strategies for Community Survival from Speculative Fiction. They cannot ride a bike or bend their wrists. You can find them on Bluesky and other social media platforms where they are mostly quiet because they'd rather talk to you face-to-face.
Learn More About Emmet
Subscribe
Notify of
Avatar


20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Avatar
9 years ago

I actually like this one (although we don’t own it or ever rewatch it anymore) but if I recall the third one was kind of blah.  I think you’re right that (among other things), it’s the characters/relationships that really sell it.

I also remember as a young kid being kind of ‘he has a black daughter???’ but then realizing the movie makes this a complete non-issue and then just being, “Oh, okay.” and moving on.

Avatar
teg
9 years ago

“Rather than play the “scary beast” card, we spend The Lost World being made to understand that these big monsters are also protective parents.”

Hi Emily,

 

I think you’ve hit on something that the first film really lacked and the third catastrophically so… you could never believe the antagonistic dinosaurs were real animals.  They were too relentless, too determined to go after the protagonists and the protagonists alone.  It was tolerable in the first film because the concept of such realistic dinosaurs was a novelty and as you said in your previous post, there were long periods when we weren’t seeing the dinosaurs.  The third film, meanwhile, never explained WHY the Spinosaurus was chasing everybody other than the fact the film needed a villain.  It was all the more jarring because the raptors did have a reason to hunt the protagonists.  The second film did it perfectly – the tyrannosaurs had an easy to understand (if not entirely plausible) motive to chase the main characters, and the raptors only turned up in one place.  I’m interested to see how things are handled in Jurassic World…

 

Oh also, I don’t know if you know this but there was going to be a different ending to the Lost World.  Instead of the male rex rampaging through San Diego, the climatic scene would be the helicopter carrying the survivors being attacked by pteradons.  I’m not sure how far they went along with it, probably not that far given how radically different the actual ending was, and I’m not sure whether it would have worked from a narrative perspective without quite a few more changes.  I suspect the original film was quite different to the final product.

 

teg

Avatar
Mr. Magic
9 years ago

A key part of the film’s problem is that we’re being asked to root for Team Malcolm…when almost everything that goes wrong is their fault.

Nick and Sarah are especially egregious examples.How many of the InGen team could’ve been saved when the Rexes crashed their camp had Nick not sabotaged Roland’s ammo? Even better, none of them would be in that position if Nick and Sarah hadn’t let the dinos loose earlier and destroyed their heavier weaponry and equipment.

In short, the second film’s tolerable if you view it as a deconstruction of active and unrestrained environmentalism and the ensuing consequences.

Avatar
Dr. Levine
9 years ago

I enjoyed this film despite its issues, but I must disagree that it is better than the novel.  While the children in the second book are sort of just new versions of Lex and Tim, Doc Thorne and Sarah Harding are two awesome characters that are not done justice in the film.  Dr. Harding in the film is being saved fairly frequently, whereas in the book she is doing the savings.  She get’s thrown overboard on her way to rescue Ian, so she swims the ocean to get to the island.  She also literally carries a helpless Ian Malcolm during the scene where the T-Rex is trying to push their trailer over the cliff, rides a motorcycle into the raptor fray fearlessly, and essentially kills the villain of the story herself.  I can’t think of a much better example of female badassery in anything short of Xena or Brienne of Tarth.

Vince Vaughan is cool and all, but replacing Doc Thorne with Nick Van Owen was not a great call in my opinion.  Thorne is like Dr. Grant and Muldoon wrapped into one and I would’ve enjoyed seeing him on the big screen (Did anyone ask Harrison Ford?)  The book also asks some interesting questions surrounding extinction that the movie steers clear of, which I felt was a mistake since the first film does such a good job of maintaining a somewhat philosophical air.

With that said, this movie is a lot of fun, even if it lacks the grandiose feeling that the first film captured and I eagerly anticipate visiting the new park this weekend!

Avatar
9 years ago

Why doesn’t anyone like The Lost World?  One sample reason: T-Rex breaks out of the cargo hold, eats everyone on board, then locks itself back in the cargo hold…

Avatar
9 years ago

OK, the cargo hold thing is a bit of a puzzler, but I still think I like this movie better than the first one, if for no other reason than more and better dinosaurs.

Avatar
9 years ago

“At the end, everyone is safe but traumatized”

Other than the red-shirt guards, the evil hacker villain, the professional hunter… oh, and the lawyer, but no one cares much about him because, well, he’s a lawyer.

Avatar
9 years ago

And Samuel L. Jackson :)

Avatar
9 years ago

In my headcanon, we’ll have a one-armed Samuel L. Jackson showing up to save the day, shouting “Get these mother”#$” dinosaurs out of my mother#%#$& island!”

Avatar
tobbA
9 years ago

Recently watched all three of them and I thought The Lost World was kinda boring compared to the first one. I guess you’re meant to be sitting at the edge of your seat being afraid for the characters lives, but since I didn’t really watch it in that manner it just felt uninteresting. It didn’t really get good until the T-Rex showed up on the mainland. The third one I had more fun watching, but of course it was a lot dumber than the other movies…

Avatar
Drunken5yearold
9 years ago

@5: There were supposed to be raptors on board the ship as well, but Spielberg decided to cut any scenes that explained the situation.

@3: I agree. The main problem with Lost World is that it has an Idiot Plot. Bloody shirts, injured baby dinos, sabotaged weapons, can’t hear because of headphones, blah blah. The first movie does a great job of setup (park is taken down due to corporate espionage) that leads organically to the character’s goals (get back to the visitor’s center, get the power back on).

It’s just not a particularly entertaining movie. Some of the sequences are well done (the raptors in the grass scene is great, the T-Rex coming to the camp is tense) and some of the jokes land (I love the cut early on from the screaming mother to the yawning Malcolm). But I actually find JP3 to be more entertaining, even if it does get quite stupid at times also.

I’d love to see somebody do an R-rated version of Jurassic Park that included more dino action and tried to match the mood/atmosphere of the novel (Crichton was a MASTER at creating a suspenseful mood). Condense the intro scenes and get the characters to the park quicker, so that there’s more time to include fun stuff like:

1) Muldoon blowing up raptors with a rocket launcher.

2) Tim poisoning raptors with dinosaur eggs.

3) Malcolm explaining how all of the park security measures are flawed (like the dino-counting scene).

4) The river trip with T-Rex attacks, the waterfall, and the aviary.

5) Eviscerated characters frantically trying to stuff their intestines back into their body (that never gets old).

6) The park running on backup power without anyone realizing it.

However, I do think that these blockbuster movies need to spend more time establishing the characters so that we actually care about the action/suspense later on. The best blockbusters are the ones that can very efficiently and entertainingly establish the characters AND make us care about them. But Jurassic Park takes FOREVER to actually get the dinosaur tour started. And most of the scenes actually aren’t absolutely necessary:

A) Do we need to see the raptor escape attempt? I would actually argue that keeping the “problems with the park” dialogue ominous and vague would be more effective at building suspense.

B) Do we need to see the scene with Gennaro and the digger? It’s all exposition, and most of it is unnecessary.

C) The scenes at the archaeological dig take too long for too little payoff.

D) The dinner scene with the annoying projectors is just the worst. Bad dialog, bad acting; everyone is just monologing at each other rather than having any real discourse.

Avatar
Mr. Magic
9 years ago

@11, I think another problem is that this was Spielberg’s first film after Schindler’s List. Making that kind of film could not have been easy and I think that lingering darkness affected the magic and objectivity here (not unlike what happened with Temple of Doom).

Avatar
9 years ago

Schindler’s List was filmed after Jurassic Park.

Avatar
9 years ago

The comments here are apt – this was a very 90s movie in all the worst ways after JURASSIC PARK being surprisingly still a very 80s movie in many of the best ways – but there’s something else that impacted me going into the theater.

I know for me – and for many of my fellow thirty-somethings – JURASSIC PARK was the first big blockbuster that came from a book. Just as the late 70s had lots of classic book-to-film adaptations, we saw the return of that starting by this point. We all know and love the trend now, but there had been a real gap in such adaptations popularly at that point – even Crichton’s last adaptions were years old, and none were as huge as JURASSIC PARK. So, the death of Ian Malcolm was something that a generation of young nerds understood as “fact” until THE LOST WORLD came out and we didn’t yet have the genre savvy to process why this was changed for the sake of Jeff Goldblum (who, actually, many of us never liked in the role given how utterly different he was from the book’s Malcolm anyway – that THE LOST WORLD further transformed the character *away* from the book’s version to the movie further cemented it more in many eyes).

Especially as the 90s continued and we entered a Dark Ages of adaptations, this sort of thing was understood, but the visuals of JURASSIC PARK made the young folks who saw it theaters after reading the book punch-drunk on dinosaurs enough that we didn’t know what to do with Spielberg forcing Crichton to rewrite the world for Goldblum’s whining paycheck. Before any other complaints within the movie, I sat there the entire time watching THE LOST WORLD asking myself as a child “Ian Malcolm is dead. Why is Ian Malcolm here!?” Regardless of anything else in JURASSIC PARK 3, at least it had Grant as the proper protagonist.

Avatar
9 years ago

While it had a lot of good moments, I didn’t like this movie for two major reasons:

1) Lack of appealing characters.  An abrasive character like Malcolm is a great supporting character, but not a lead–I like a hero or heroine you can root for.  And none of the other characters really clicked with me, either (except Peter Postlethwaite, who was such a good actor that he drew you in no matter how prickly or nasty his character was). 

2) The San Diego scenes were so removed from the rest of the narrative that the whole sequence felt tacked on and irrelevant.

Avatar
Cecrow
9 years ago

I liked the slow build-up to dinosaurs in the first movie, so I can never understand why the goal when writing these scripts is “get them to the island asap.”  This 2nd movie has too much colour-by-numbers, transparent “making scenes happen” for me. The girl’s gymnastics skills save the day (unconvincingly), we rampage through San Diego because that would be cool, etc.  Too many echoes from the first movie’s highlights, too much forcing this plot’s highlights to happen. I despise most of the characters in JP3 and wish more of them had died, but I’ve seen it three or four times.  I’ve never gone back to JP2 for seconds.  I like the idea of what it might have become had they taken the concept on a more serious ride. I did like that the dog was eaten, though.  Way too many dogs were being miraculously saved in those years, it had become a cliché.

Avatar
9 years ago

I always liked The Lost World as a kid because… well, more T-Rexes.  Always thought it gave the Raptors the short shrift, though.  And yeah, it’s a bit too silly at times (gymnastics, the chaos in San Diego, T-Rex in the backyard, the dead boat crew), but I’m still a fan.  If JP is the Star Wars or Empire, Lost World is Jedi.  And III is The Phantom Menace.

Avatar
9 years ago

I actually did not like Sarah at all. Despite being a scientist, she was one of the dumbest characters in the movie. Really, it wasn’t her curiosity that drove the movie forward so much as her stupidity. She claims to be able to survive alone on the island and tells people off for disturbing the wildlife, then proceeds to nearly get everyone killed several times in the movie by making incredibly dumb choices. Honestly, she reminds me a lot of the people who go to places like Yellowstone and try to play with animals like Bison. Having her as one of the main animal rights advocates in this movie was a terrible move, as she clearly had no idea what she was talking about.

Avatar
Walt G
9 years ago

The Lost World was one of my favorite novels growing up. 

The one by Arthur Conan Doyle, of course.

Avatar
9 years ago

@19 I’d like to see a first rate adaptation of that version of The Lost World on the big screen!  The previous movie and TV versions never quite hit the mark, although some of them were fun.