I watched Star Trek Beyond over the weekend, and it’s a really good time—a definite step up from Into Darkness and a worthy piece of Trek for the franchise’s 50th Anniversary. The deaths of both Leonard Nimoy and Anton Yelchin cast a shadow over the movie, but both are acknowledged with compassion and grace, the central plot is thematically chewy and fun, and Kirk’s emotional arc across the three reboot movies to date pays off here in an extremely satisfying way. It also has, flat out, one of the most air punch victory moments in the franchise’s history, as well as a beautifully timed tip of the hat to Spaced, the epochal sitcom in which Simon Pegg first made his comedy mark.
But it also highlighted the unique problem that Star Trek as a franchise has: it has to please not one, but three separate audiences. Namely long-term fans, fans of the new, rebooted material, and people who are entirely new to the concept as a whole.
That’s one of the few areas where Star Trek Beyond fails. It’s a great sequel to the previous two movies and honors the original franchise very well but its connections to and dependence on the past is not entirely welcoming to—and may come close to being incomprehensible for—newcomers not already steeped in the previous movies and the Trek universe in general. The plot explores the changing role of a starship captain, the continued viability of Starfleet and the United Federation of Planets, and whether or not a soldier can ever truly lay down their arms. In formation with the other movies it works brilliantly. As a movie for new arrivals, it’s a little like watching a surprisingly violent but well-choreographed Cirque du Soleil show set in space.
Which brings us to Star Trek: Discovery and what it both does and doesn’t need to be.
Discovery, the new TV series scheduled to premiere worldwide next year, is already breaking new ground. We have a new ship, a new name, and a new format, with the show having been confirmed as a serial in the style of the uniformly excellent Marvel Netflix shows.
That’s the first piece of good news. With the exception of the Xindi plot in Enterprise, Star Trek has rarely experimented with long form arcs. It makes particular sense with a new show, a new ship and crew, and possibly a new time frame, too. We need to spend time getting comfortable with these people, so the show spending time with them working on a overarching predicament or situation makes perfect sense.
That structure also speaks very well to the new production team’s approach to the past. Five decades of continuity haunts Trek’s corridors like the ghost of Season Finales Past, and the franchise is almost always at its worst when it bows under that massive weight. The colossal misstep of the Khan plot in Into Darkness showed just how badly a story can go sideways, and it’s heartening to see that lesson has been taken to heart. It’s a big universe, and it makes sense for the new show to tell new stories in new ways. At the time of writing, rumours persist that the show is either set prior to every other version of Star Trek we’ve seen or in the time period immediately following the TOS-era crew’s scenes in Generations. Either option represents new ground, and either would work very well.
There is one element of Beyond that Discovery needs to share. As was pointed out on the excellent School of Movies episode discussing the film, Beyond does some quietly subversive stuff with gender norms—Sulu’s husband and daughter are already a matter of record, but there are several other moments where the film makes it clear that heterosexuality is not the only normal there is.
Of course it’s not perfectly handled—the studio’s annoyingly coy approach to Sulu’s husband mirrors the way a Korra/Asami romance had to be sketched in rather than handled overtly in the closing seasons of Legend of Korra. But given the ways that Next Generation, in particular, explored issues of sexuality across much of the LGBT spectrum, there’s a lot of precedent for Discovery to do the same. Not to mention the original show’s pioneering diversity in terms of both cast and characters. In short then, Discovery needs to have a crew which is diverse across multiple axes to mirror the realities of in modern life. Trek is a series based on hope, and that hope needs to be reflected in a crew that speaks to everyone. Happily, the recent announcement from producer Bryan Fuller that the show will feature an openly gay character speaks pretty clearly to that.
Then, of course, we must consider the issues at the heart of the story. Trek is the textbook example of using drama as a means of exploring the issues of its day. Deep Space Nine was based around the chaotic frontiers of Europe in the wake of the Communist bloc collapse, while Next Generation delved into everything from the unique pressures of cutting edge academic life to mortality, PTSD, multiple explorations of multiple sexualities, and the ethical questions inherent in the evolution of Artificial Intelligence. Every incarnation of Star Trek has been defined by the events of its time: the Vietnam War, the events of September 11th, the curiously mundane and horrifying final moments of a lost astronaut, the rights of holographic life forms, the way our stories are deformed and twisted by history and memory. All of these and so many more have been covered in Trek’s five decades worth of social concerns. Discovery will undoubtedly continue that tradition, both embracing and in turn, being defined by, the issues of the current day.
So that covers what the show can, and should do. What it shouldn’t do is both simpler and far harder to accept, at least for one of the audiences it needs to reach…
Discovery cannot be set in the same time period as any previous show.
I’ve seen numerous fan requests for the series to be set post-Nemesis, or during the Romulan war, or concurrent with the Next Generation-era trio of shows. If you set the show during a time designed to please existing fans, you’re assigning the audience that’s new to Trek homework they neither want nor deserve. It’s essentially giving the show an entrance exam and in order for it to reach the audience it needs, that simply can’t happen. Besides, if Discovery performs well then every other previous show will get a bump as new fans go forth and investigate the five decades of stories waiting for them—but they’ll get to do so on their own terms.
That isn’t to say the new series can’t draw on elements from the show’s history, and the “31” in Discovery‘s registry number has already been heavily hinted as being a reference to Starfleet Intelligence’s Section 31. But the show has to play with old toys on new terms or it will be measured against the franchise’s past in the exact way the reboot movies have and, at times, been found wanting. Again, Fuller’s recent announcement that the show will be set ten years before the original series and in the original timeline is absolutely in line with this hope. While initial reports suggested it was being designed to fit into the era briefly seen at the start of Generations, this is, if anything more interesting. There’s ample opportunity to farm the nostalgia of the past, but even more to break new ground. The fact that Discovery has also been confirmed as not featuring a Captain as the lead character further drives home this willingness to find new perspectives on old ideas.
This is ultimately why Beyond lets down new viewers, because it’s designed to appeal to those who are already on board. For it’s built-in audience, that’s very much a feature not a bug, give that it’s the third movie in a loose trilogy built on extended riffs and alternate versions of the original timeline, after all. But if Beyond pleases the fans already steeped in its mythology and references, Discovery needs to move forward, in a new direction: it has to break new ground in story format, casting, theme, and time period.
In other words, Discovery has to be both the ship’s name and the show’s mission statement. In order to win new viewers and please old it needs to do one thing; go, boldly. And I can’t wait to see where we end up.
Alasdair Stuart is a freelancer writer, RPG writer and podcaster. He owns Escape Artists, who publish the short fiction podcasts Escape Pod, Pseudopod, Podcastle, Cast of Wonders, and the magazine Mothership Zeta. He blogs enthusiastically about pop culture, cooking and exercise at Alasdairstuart.com, and tweets @AlasdairStuart.
Discovery, the new TV series scheduled to hit Netflix worldwide next year
Unless you’re in the US or Canada, where it’ll be available only on CBS’s newly-announced All Access streaming service.
Star Trek has rarely experimented with long form arcs.
DS9 and the Dominion War would probably disagree with that assertion.
@1: Edited–thanks for catching that!
Also we’ve updated the post to reflect the further revelations from Bryan Fuller that have popped up since the essay was first submitted.
the “31” in Discovery‘s registry number has already been heavily hinted as being a reference to Starfleet Intelligence’s Section 31
Oh, angels and ministers of grace defend us — I sure hope not. I just about hit the roof of my cinema during Into Darkness when I realized, of all the things they could have preserved from the Prime timeline, they were hanging onto Section 31, the most cynical element of Star Trek ever concocted. Yes, it’s “realistic”… but, as Ken Rey is wont to say over on the “Mission Log” podcast, if we can’t even imagine a future where no one has to resort to unethical subterfuge in order to achieve peace, then we’re in real trouble.
But I liked your article, Alisdair Alasdair (EDIT: Apologies!), and agree with it. I guess you were the victim of bad timing, now that we know Discovery is set a mere decade before TOS. But I’m hopeful they’ll still mostly do their own thing, and not get bogged down by that corridor-haunting continuity you mentioned. I’d personally have preferred another leap forward, into the 25th or 26th centuries… but, all the other details we know so far, I like. I’m certainly ready for January to get here!
@2/Lurker – I could be wrong, but wasn’t the longest strictly serialized story on DS9 a six-episode stretch? I know many plot threads of DS9 continued week to week, weaving their way in and out of other, mostly non-related episodes… But I still don’t think it’s wrong, even if that war arc is granted as “long form,” that it’s something Star Trek has “rarely done.” DS9 wasn’t serialized in the same way this show will be, or that Enterprise‘s third season was.
It is a serial?
I’m out. Done.
I just want something I can dip in and out of without having to watch a ton of other crap to get a story. One story per episode and one episode per story, please.
I think your point about having to please multiple audiences really nails the sense of hesitancy I get from the Abrams movies, but there is a longer standing tradition of Star Trek shows wanting to do multiple things and not really committing to any of them. Both DS9 and Voyager set out to be dark & gritty AND appealing to children. These shows wanted to take the franchise in new, more mature directions, but struggled to move away from the wide-eyed optimism of its origins. DS9 ultimately founds its way, Voyager didn’t. My big complaint has always been that this is a recognizable property with an established fan base and an even broader audience willing to jump on if given a reason. Why seize the opportunity to take chances and produce exciting, innovative television? Too often Star Trek shows and films have opted to play it safe.
I recently posted my thoughts on the state of the Star Trek franchise on my blog, for those who are interested. http://davidliss.com/?page_id=23
ST:D will not be on CBS All Access in Canada:
Yup, Canada gets it on cable.
Honestly, I’m not thrilled with the latest news. I mean, serial, great, female lead, great, LGBT character, great.
10 years before the original series and yet in the original timeline? Eeeeeeehhh…… no thank you.
A robot? Well, they could do something novel with it, but right now it looks like a rehash of Data in a timeline that really doesn’t fit. No thank you.
More aliens on the crew? Great in general, but 10 years before the original series, in supposedly the original timeline, where aliens were still something of an anomaly on Starfleet ships? No thank you.
The LAST Star Trek series we had was a prequel, I don’t want another one. It doesn’t have to be post TNG (though I’d be happy if it was), but at least set it in the century or so between them when there were many changes going on.
Bah. Enthusiasm levels are down to 33%, sir!
I completely agree that this nee Star Trek show should be far away from the other shows in terms of timeline but why another prequel?
Enterprise bothered me on the fact that the tech looked better than what Kirk’s crew got. OUr own current tech has surpassed Kirk’s in terms of style. We have tablets like TNG, touch screens like TNG and small communicators.
If this crew has things like Kirk it will look dated to any newcomers. If it has tech fancier then Kirk it messes with those minor details that can irk long time fans
I was hoping for a show that would be to Voyager what TNG was to TOS. That Voyagers crew and subsequently DS9 and TNG would be much older or have already passed away. That we could see what has become of our beloved federation in the many years since. They would have the freedom to explore, could have any callbacks to the four previous shows and wow us with the futuristic feel.
This tens years before Kirk feels like a confining box. Maybe not to the new fans but to long term trekkies like myself.
Re: International release/availability/where to watch–we’ve simplified that bit and added a link, which should hopefully avoid any further confusion. Thanks!
Am I the only one who thinks that ship is incredibly ugly? *And* in America I’m expected to subscribe to something I otherwise don’t want at all to see the series? Nope. Thanks anyway. Maybe I’ll see it on Netflix. Someday. Not interested.
What? While there might be a shade of that in DS9, the initial Cardassian/Bajoran plot is more akin to Israel and Palestine than post USSR collapse Europe, IMHO, crossed with post-WWII stuff, perhaps. If you want something more like the Communist bloc collapse, check out the New Frontier novels, at least the first few, dealing with the collapse of a large empire that borders the Federation.
I fail to see how the Cardassians withdrawing from Bajor, and the subsequent rebuild of that planet has much to do with post-USSR fall Europe.
I call bull on this; for a new fan it’s the same if the show is set in post-Nemesis time or pre-TOS post-ENT time’ as long as the writers balance how they treat new and old viewers.
@2 – LukerWithout: Agreed.
@Magnus “Initial Cardassian/Bajoran plot is more akin to Israel and Palestine” ? Think you misspelled China and Tibet. Or a wish-fulfilment story thereof.
A newcomer to Beyond doesn’t need to watch ST Enterprise or any other series to understand what’s happening in that movie. It’s presented in a way that doesn’t go into too much detail that would lose the viewer. You need only watch the first two reboot movies, and even those are barely connected to Beyond. To me, the movie felt like a soft reboot, or restart of sorts, in the way Skyfall was for the Craig Bond era (also a 50th anniversary movie).
@12/Tracey – I thought the 1701-D was incredibly ugly until I saw “Encounter at Farpoint.” I still don’t think it looks great from a “directly beneath” camera angle, but otherwise I fell in love with it and wouldn’t want it any other way. I suspect I’ll be the same way with Discovery.