With Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them coming to theaters November 18, J.K. Rowling has shared a final installment detailing the history of magic and wizarding culture in North America. After learning about the origins of magic and the establishment of the wizarding school Ilvermorny, we get a history lesson on MACUSA, or the Magical Congress of the United States of America. Tying together the Salem Witch Trials, the American Revolution, and a fictional metaphor for America’s dark history of segregation, this Pottermore story tracks the contentious relationship between both American wizards and their British ancestors, as well as American wizards and No-Majes (or American Muggles).
Here are the basics of the story:
A guiding principle in modern wizarding culture, but especially in North America, was the International Statute of Wizarding Secrecy—wizards decided that the best way to ensure their safety, as well as live freer and happier lives, was to go completely underground with a self-supporting political and economic system. No surprise, American wizards were especially keen on this idea after the Salem Witch Trials of 1692-3. MACUSA (pronounced mah-cooz-ah) was established in 1693 with two primary goals: (1) get rid of Scourers, corrupt wizards who hunted their own kind; and (2) protect against wizarding criminals who had fled Europe for America.
MACUSA’s early years were marked by an emphasis on law enforcement; its first President, the “warlike” Josiah Jackson, trained the first dozen Aurors. As these twelve wizards and witches were all volunteers, they and their descendants are well-respected. The original Aurors were:
- Wilhelm Fischer
- Theodard Fontaine (whose direct descendant Agilbert is the present-day Headmaster of Ilvermorny)
- Gondulphus Graves (whose descendant Percival Graves plays a key part in Fantastic Beasts)
- Robert Grimsditch
- Mary Jauncey
- Carlos Lopez
- Mungo MacDuff
- Cormac O’Brien
- Abraham Potter (yes, that Potter, though he’s only a distant relative to Harry)
- Berthilde Roche
- Helmut Weiss
- Charity Wilkinson
Unlike the dark wizards in England, the Scourers’ strategy was much more covert: They disappeared into No-Maj society but ensured that the tradition of suspicion of magic endured. Likely this contributed to the fact that MACUSA did not cooperate with local No-Maj governments, unlike many of their European counterparts.
In 1777, President Elizabeth McGilliguddy presided over the Country or Kind? debate regarding magical involvement in the Revolutionary War: “[D]id the magical community owe their highest allegiance to the country in which they had made their homes, or to the global underground wizarding community? Were they morally obliged to join American No-Majes in their fight for liberation from the British Muggles? Or was this, simply put, not their fight?” The fact that the British Ministry of Magic’s response was a terse “Sitting this one out” further frayed connections between the trans-Atlantic wizarding communities. (MACUSA shot back “Mind you do.”) American witches and wizards did not officially join No-Majes in battle, but there was certainly some magical intervention, and enough of a reason for the American wizarding community to celebrate Independence Day.
But despite this new shared holiday, MACUSUA passed Rappaport’s Law in 1790, which enforced total segregation of the wizarding and No-Maj communities. Created after the daughter of then-President Emily Rappaport and a Scourer descendant almost revealed the existence of magic (though the history does not clarify how), intermarriage and even friendship between wizards and No-Majes was deemed illegal.
Since its establishment, MACUSA had searched for a permanent home. Various interventions by No-Majes forced MACUSA out of the Appalachian mountains, Baltimore, and Washington, with the organization eventually landing in New York City in the 1890s. Interestingly, the Woolworth Building was used by both No-Majes and wizards and witches in entirely separate spheres, thanks to a transformation spell that opened it to the latter.
The history ends in the 1920s, when Newt Scamander stumbles in the middle of MACUSA’s business and threatens to expose the existence of magic thanks to his runaway fantastic beasts. Pottermore provides a few more details:
As with most other magical governing bodies, the Department of Magical Law Enforcement is the largest department in MACUSA.
Rappaport’s Law was still in operation in the 1920s and several offices in MACUSA had no counterpart in the Ministry of Magic; for example, a sub-division dealing with No-Maj Fraternisation and an office issuing and verifying wand permits, which everyone, citizen and visitor, was supposed to carry within the States.
A significant difference between the wizarding governments of the United States and the UK of this time was the penalty for serious crime. Whereas British witches and wizards were sent to Azkaban, the worst criminals in America were executed.
In the 1920s the President of MACUSA was Seraphina Picquery from Savannah. The Department of Magical Law Enforcement was headed by Percival Graves, a well-respected descendant of one of the original twelve American Aurors.
Thoughts:
Secrecy, law enforcement, segregation, execution… The history of magic in America is much darker than I ever imagined. In the Potter books, whenever Muggles got mixed up in the wizarding world, it seemed as if Obliviate spells could mostly fix matters; in America, the consequences are much more dire, as are the precautions meant to avoid such fallout.
We do have to point out that there are a few historical inaccuracies… Like, how did the wizarding community know to call their organization MACUSA before it was the USA, or to call their leader a President before there were Presidents? (Unless they had gotten their hands on some time turners…) Not to mention that neither Washington nor Washington D.C. existed in 1777.
I thought it was interesting that the history skipped right over the American wizarding community’s involvement (or lack thereof) in the Civil War. Obviously the international wizarding community had no horse in that race—unless they were simply interested to watch America potentially tear itself apart—but I wonder if wizards and witches’ homes were divided over taking sides. And how did wizards of color feel about slavery, and especially the racial segregation laws that were established among No-Majes after the Civil War and the abolition of slavery?
The notion of “segregation” has a very specific connotation in American history, so it’s a bit odd for Rowling to be inviting a similar comparison between communities separated by race and those separated by magic. In fact, she doesn’t address the issue of race at all, marking the distinction between wizards and No-Majes without delving into the various communities contained within each group. Then there’s Rappaport’s law, established because of a security breach: Even though it doesn’t explicitly seem prejudiced, the ban on intermarriage must mean that there’s a higher percentage of magical purebloods in America, which might lead to the same dangerous mindset as the purebloods across the pond in England.
That final mention of Colin Farrell’s character Percival Graves, descendant of original Auror Gondulphus Graves, was oh-so-casual. We knew that he too is an Auror, but now we learn that he runs the Department of Magical Law Enforcement… yet in the trailers for Fantastic Beasts, he seems to be something of a villain bent on chasing Newt Scamander. I’m even more convinced after the latest preview featuring Graves’ surreptitious talks with Credence Barebone (Ezra Miller), whose mother heads the anti-witchcraft New Salem Philanthropic Society—is this Auror a secret Scourer?
And here’s a quick little preview of MACUSA’s role in Fantastic Beasts, complete with a rad-looking frieze detailing some of the MACUSA history you read on Pottermore:
It seems weird that US wizarding society is so monolith, especially if it is supposed to mirror our history with segregation.
I also am curious about how the magical community would feel about the civil war, race relations, etc.
I just really need the whole 1693 – United States thing to be fixed. Rowling can come up with any wacky magic canon explanation and I’ll buy it. I just really need one.
Like now. Please.
so yeah, or course in the 1700s everyone was american in north america… there were no french or later no canada… Not to mention the mexicans! I’m a bit disappointed by Rowling lack of research on this subject. :(
@3 – me too. It bugs me every time I see it. I feel like JKR regards the pre-revolutionary colonies as some kind of unified institution, and she’s completely ignoring their actual history. Which she is – it makes me worry that she’s ignoring other important things about US history that I think would make the movie more fun.
@@.-@ – She has a Lopez in there! It’s not much, but it’s something.
4. MlleAri
I think there are some French and German names in there, but your point stands. With the exception of Lopez the group sounds pretty North Eastern European. Florida had colonial settlements at this time, as did all the states boarding the Great Lakes. And also there were native peoples and maybe they should be included here?
5. EllenMCM Agreed. Regional differences in the colonies (and all through US history) have always been widespread and complex. There were actually some accused witched from the Salem trials who escaped to the colony of New York and were completely safe. Massachusetts was also untouched by later waves of witch hysteria.
More importantly to her theme of segregation, it worked differently in different areas. The Loves were able to bring their case to court because it was an issue of one state refusing to recognize a marriage that was completely legal elsewhere. There were even complexities within the same cities. The Boston Celtics were one of the first teams in the NBA to draft African American players while the Boston Red Sox dragged their heels in baseball. It is very weird to me that she is making a hard line out of segregation and then setting the story in New York City in the Twenties. This is where and when racial mixing would happen in the States. Jazz. She is ignoring the history of Jazz and it makes me sad.
What about wizards born to muggle families in North America? I think Rowling has studied about as much US History as Americans have studied British history, and boy does it show. MACUSA is the sort of name that would’ve been applied in the mid 20th Century (think MACV, for example) and “No-Maj” instead of “Muggle” has a late 20th century feel.
As to ” neither Washington nor Washington D.C. existed in 1777″, Georgetown (a part of DC) was there. So…
“almost revealed the existence of magic (though the history does not clarify how)”, detail is here: https://www.pottermore.com/writing-by-jk-rowling/rappaports-law-en
Perhaps this is the history of magic in the US as written in 1920, with a 1920’s viewpoint on things?
Although I’m inclined to believe that JKR left the American Civil War well alone because it seems to still be a bit of a raw nerve.
@6 – YES. It makes me so sad this this work, set in the 1920s in New York City, appears to be ignoring the history of Jazz. And Swing. It’s an enormous missed opportunity.
@@.-@ and @6 — The names bother me so much! At least replace one of the English ones with a Dutch one.
@7 — Let’s go one step further: what about the muggle born wizards and witches who were also born into slavery? (And since I have Wilson’s Underground Railroad and the story of Nat Turner on my mind, can we think about the implications of that both for the wizard slaves and an already paranoid Southern white society?)
I know that history and structurally sound large scale world building aren’t Rowling’s forte but this entire endeavor just seems so dull compared to what was possible.
If it were just this upcoming movie, then I don’t think that I would quibble so much about Rowling’s appropriation. But when she’s crafting an alternative history of the United States, Canada and Mexico that doesn’t even include major historical events, beliefs and stories that shaped these three nations because she couldn’t bother to do her home work/would rather not deal with them then it’s just lazy world building. It’s using my country and history as decoration.
So the magical community on both sides of the ocean discussed whether they should be involved in the American revolution/war of independence. But there’s no mention of how Mexican and American magical communities reacted to the war between those two countries (or the independence and annexation of Texas). This seems exactly what it is: a history of the USA written by a British, with mainly a British POV.
I wonder if by Washington JK Rowling actually means Washington State, what with all the Sasquatch stuff involved while MACUSA was there. She may be using the modern name for the territory out of convenience.
As for MACUSA as a name, it is not uncommon for people to refer to the United States in the years before the Constitution was adopted. Often they’ll tack on words like nascent, but just as often they’ll leave them off for the sake of convenience, since everyone pretty well understands what they mean anyway. Perhaps it was originally the Magical Continental Congress (MACC?), but nobody uses that name because they all know the history and that it was rechristened MACUSA after the Constitution was ratified.
I do have some questions, though. Does MACUSA have a coincident jurisdiction as the USA? Does it cover also Canada and Mexico? If so, why is it MACUSA? Why not Magical Congress of North America? If it is limited to US territories, then does Canada fall under the British Ministry of Magic? Is Mexico under a spin-off of whatever Spain’s magical community calls itself?