This week we’re looking at the 2011 Hugo Nominees for Best Novel. You’ll be able to find all the posts in this ongoing series here.
Feed by Mira Grant (Hugo nominee for Best Novel 2011) can pretty much be summed up in three words: Politics, journalism, and zombies. In that order. The story revolves around sibling journalists Georgia and Shawn Mason who are leaders among the burgeoning bloggers-as-legitimate-reporters phenomenon that sprang up the wake of The Rising, aka the zombie apocalypse. They land a coveted position reporting on the campaign trail with Presidential hopeful Senator Ryman.
Lets talk about the good, or in this case the phenomenal. The worldbuilding along is worth the Hugo nomination. I was hoping for a complex and plausible zombie apocalypse and I got that and more. The details about the origin of the zombie virus known as Kellis-Amberlee, or the KA virus, are insane (like Michael Crichton insane). Half the time it felt like I was reading about a real event because the details were so precise and exhaustive. The science behind the virus is frighteningly realistic as are the motivations behind the scientist who originally set out to cure the common cold, the activist group who stole it and released it to the public, and the research organization who were curing cancer (turns out we can eradicate cancer and colds but with one tiny side effect: zombies).
In the twenty-five years that followed the zombie outbreak (in the Feed timeline, we’re not due for zombies until 2014), the world has been significantly altered. Safety protocols and laws have been enacted in every single level of society. Most people don’t bother to leave their homes, preferring instead to interact with the world online. Vegetarianism has been universally adopted since no steak is worth the risk of eating infected meat. People don’t argue so much about capital punishment anymore, instead other issues come to prominence, like whether or not all animals large enough (40 lbs and above) to become infected by the KA virus should be exterminated or not.
The change that has the biggest impact on the story is the rise of the blogger. When the dead first began to rise, traditional media outlets initially dismissed it as a hoax. Bloggers were the ones to first report on what was really happening and were the first to get life-saving information into the hands of the general public. Practically overnight, bloggers became not just legitimate and reputable, but heroes in their own right.
Here’s where we cross into the not so good, at least from my perspective. Feed, despite its fantastic post zombie apocalyptic setting isn’t really about zombies. It’s a backdrop mostly, a very cool, very detailed backdrop, but a backdrop nonetheless. The real story is the presidential campaign. I personally don’t enjoy watching CNN for kicks, but if you do, than you’ll probably love this book. And I say CNN as opposed to the FOX News Channel because the politics in Feed are most definitely of the left wing persuasion. There are several lengthy passages that conservatives will likely find insulting, and that doesn’t even include the cartoonishly evil General Tate.
Slight spoiler ahead. When we first meet the villain, I immediately dismissed him as a potential “bad guy” because he was a walking, talking cliché. He’s depicted as a right wing nutcase, a religious fanatic, and a gun enthusiast. I kept expecting to walk in on him clubbing gay baby seals to death with Rush Limbaugh mugs. Seriously, this is the villain? Come on. Since when is painfully predictable ever fun? I was really hoping for a twist that would reveal the villain to be someone we never expected, but no. End of spoiler.
At over 600 pages, it gets a bit boring being on the ol’ campaign trail after the first 200. George and Shawn are interesting enough characters and their relationship is one of the highlights of Feed, and of course the zombie Rising and the world it created are amazing, but frankly the setting deserved more than the ho-hum political thriller plot that occurs.
So why the Hugo nomination for Best Novel? The post zombie apocalypse world in Feed is superb. The details, history, and reprucussions are real enough to give you chills—both the good kind and the bad. And beyond that, the story and the future it imagines is unique with a capital U. I could read a hundred zombie books and not find one that blends this level of realism, humor, and perspective half so well. But for me, that’s what makes the book—with its bait and switch shifted focus, an unimaginative villain, and a plot that staggered for most of the Feed—so much harder to swallow.
I’m just getting into Grant’s other series (written under the name Seanan McGuire), the October Daye series, which, if the first book is any indication, is a gritty and glorious true urban fantasy series. But I’m going to pass on the future books in the Newsflesh Trilogy and get my zombie fix elsewhere. I’ve had my fill of Feed.
Abigail Johnson manages the Tor.com Urban Fantasy Facebook and Twitter when she’s not busy stockpiling weapons, canned goods, and mapping out which of her neighbors houses to raid first when the zombie apocalypse begins.
Thanx! I will be getting this for my Kindle.
I liked both aspects of the story that you mentioned. The zombie portion is very well done. As you say, it is the backdrop to the story and a very well done backdrop it is.
The political portion was also quite well done from my viewpoint. For the most part the political portion is more about the coverage of the campaign (and certain mysteries therein) than the actual politics.
I think you are a bit mistaken in who the “real” bad guy is. The general is the immediate fall guy, but it seems like there is a deeper conspiracy at work. I definitely intend to get the follow on volumes.
I’ve got to admit, I’m a Feed lover. I can see the flaws, but to me, the book had that ‘gotta-read-it’ power that my favorite books have, along with a climax that kicks you in the teeth. I eagerly awaited Deadline and am now counting the months (next May!) for Blackout, the final book in the series.
I too loved the detailed scientific background, but what really made the book for me was the characters- Shawn and Georgia are wonderfully crafted.
Also, let’s not forget to mention that, in terms of any perceived political slant, the Republican presidential candidate is portrayed as an eminently reasonable, intelligent and balanced conservative. This is not an “all conservatives are evil” book at all.
I’m afraid I liked it rather less than you did. This book is pretty horribly flawed, IMNSHO, and its strengths (a reasonably grounded rationale for zombie animation and decent action scene writing) do not begin to make up for some really ridiculous futurism fails along with the other flaws you mentioned.
I’d rather No Award.
For me Feed did an exceptional job of examining the range of hair-trigger reactions brought about by constant hyper-awareness. Feed is about fear: fear as a reaction to catastrophy, fear as a fine-honed tool of survival, fear as a mind-numbing, mind-consuming drive toward mob-behavior, fear as an instrument of politics, fear as an impetus towards withdrawal, fear as an impetus towards risk-taking, fear as utter paranoia. And it’s relentlessly readable.
shalter @2. As usual, I agree with you. If you haven’t read Deadline yet, I think you’re going to love it. Tim Pratt, in his Locus review, said that he’d doubted Mira Grant could catch him out with the same kind of emotional gut-punch she delivers in Feed, and then she does it again–more than once. That. Also, politicians are notably absent, so we have a rather different front-story.
Susan@6:Exactly. The fear as an instrument of politics also provides a bit of current commentary for the “war on terrorism.”
@6 Susan – very well said.
I enjoyed this book quite a lot. The focus of zombie-ism being a direct result of a virus that can be tested and verified is fascinating. Also, the fact that everyone has a low level form of the virus and can basically spontaneously convert is terrifying! A very interesting and novel take IMHO on the zombie genre.
The only bit I wish they had toned down was the incessant gadget and blog talk – yes I know, they’re bloggers. I get it. You don’t have to keep hammering into my head that all have lots of cameras and gadgets.
Also, the level of tech made it feel like it was written 5-10 years ago – that’s the prob with getting too specific on the tech in a story. It dates it like a bad penny.
I guess it could have been the zombie plague caused us to go backwards in tech somewhat.
This looks really interesting. Sticking it in my wishlist until my to-read list has shrunk a little. I also love the cover :D
Embarrassingly, I’ve stalled on this one. *checks ipad* On my settings, I’m on page 53 of 333. The escape from the zombies at the start was gripping, the practicalities of living in a workable society after the zombie plague were interesting … and then the solid infodumps, the political campaign story and the breathless, unvarying tone got boring. Even if my sense of duty gets me to the end, this isn’t getting my vote.
The very reason you don’t like this book is the very reason I loved it! I really enjoy all our different perspectives. I would never have read this because I am heartily sick and tired of zombies and apocalypes that I couldn’t bring myself to try another – but I read all books nominated for both the Hugo and Nebula and so I started this one expecting the same old same old. I was not just pleasantly surprised I was overwhelmed. I loved the fact that the world was so meticulously delineated and was not about the zombies but about the effect of zombies on the society of the USA. Even more important were the characters. They richly detailed and so alive. What a terrific book. I went right out and puchased Deadline, the second in this series and look eagerly forward to the last. As far as novels go, I was really glad this was nominated and it is in a tie for second place with One Hundred Thousand Kingdoms, but The Dervish House is one of the best SF novels published in many years. That is the clear winner, in my mind.
Oh, yeah, I forgot to mention the infodumps.
Man, are these ever infodump-ey. Man.
I get it, it’s blog entries, right? But just…no, I don’t particularly want to be hit with a wall of text that way, thanks. Really, Neal Stephenson is the only person I’ll accept that from.
I am astounded this made it on to any shortlist. Whilst, yes, the backdrop was pretty well-thought out and the action scenes were good, the rest was pretty terrible. I was actually embarrassed for the author when I realised the political plotting wasn’t going to be the reasonably well-signalled reverse you would expect but was in fact that… naive, I suppose. Even for the Young Adult novel I presume this was meant to be, it was still alarmingly basic (I don’t want to disparage YA fiction, Pullman writes ‘children’s stories’ after all). And the blogging thing…! Wholly implausible, just read like the wish-fulfilment of someone who Really Likes Their Blog. Different ‘types’ of blogger (Irwin’s etc)… I can wholly buy into a bio-engineered virus that zombifies humanity; in no way did the blogger thing feel believable.
Lastly – the action scenes – so much better than the rest of the book. But there are about 3. In a loooong novel. Which you would expect from the blurb to be fairly action-packed.
Avoid.
Agree with KDA. In a book where you’d spect action and horror, you only really get 3 moments in the whole novel. The whole novel was quite boring and repetive since 90 % of the book talks about that boring political campain that I don’t really care about. I came to read about zombies, not about Democrats vs Republicans. There are way better books out there,