Fantasy is the genre of hope.
It’s the genre of the Grail Quest, where the King is the Land, where Lancelot can heal with a touch, where nine walkers just might stand against the nine riders that are evil, where a few farm kids set out from a small town between two rivers to stop the Dark One, where no man can defeat the Nazgul lord so good thing Eowyn’s on our side, where Aerin bests Agsded and Maur to free her city, where Tenar finds her name and Aang can save the world.
But if fantasy is the genre of hope, it’s also the genre of a particular kind of danger. To hope is to commit, and commitment’s scary because we’re never hurt so much as when we care. Saving the world is hard. You lose people along the way.
Tolkien knew this. People who accuse him of wearing rose-colored glasses forget that the best even Frodo can do is fail well—he does succumb to the ring’s temptation on Mount Doom—and return wounded to a broken homeland, to linger on until he goes into the west leaving Sam behind. Hope and pain are right there in the genre’s modern taproot.
Some days, though, it’s hard for me to connect with all that meaning and power. In dark moments I feel myself drowning in kings and empires and satraps and dukes, in crowns, in magical assassins and MacGuffiny mystic objects and epic destinies and window dressing. “I’ve never lived with a king,” I grump, “and basically nobody else has either. Why read about them?” In dark moments I grow furious with medieval pantomime.
Now, this isn’t fair of me. The old stories and old forms endure because they still speak to us. But the more society changes, the greater the risk form will crush meaning. Rudolf Bultmann describes a process of mythological drift: teachers teach in terms they and their audience understand. If you and I both know there are dragon kingdoms beneath the sea, and you want to use the ocean as a metaphor—say, for the nature of the mind—you may mention those dragons. Two thousand years from now, people who know there aren’t any underwater dragon kingdoms will read a record of our conversation and say, “what morons! There aren’t any dragons down there,” and miss the point. But readers can do better: we can break open old tales to find their teaching.
In dark moments, though, I don’t always want to attack a tale of kings to find the hope I need. I want a book that reflects the hopes I know, and the dangers people face as they work to realize those hopes.
I want a fantasy of taking to the streets. I want a fantasy with crowds and leaders, negotiations and council meetings. I want dockworkers, ex-priests, professional necromancers, cops, schoolteachers, chefs, gang leaders, imperfect human beings of all races and genders, with histories and baggage, who become heroes—sometimes only for a moment.
I want a government terrified for the future, struggling to preserve its power and work with a movement despite massive historical differences. I want an undead overlord who’s slain gods with his bare hands explaining to a citizen council why his rezoning proposal will improve the lives of the very people who protest it. I want a consulting sorcerer torn between her loyalties as talks fail and battle lines are drawn. I want a priest choosing to stand by his family, or by the faithful who look to him for help.
I want people who beat against the walls of history, who are bound by choices others made forty years ago, by the outcomes of old wars. I want good intentions to lead to horrible ends, and vice versa. I want a book of human and inhuman beings trying to do better, and of that trial being—maybe—worth the consequences.
And I want a book with magic.
So I wrote one.
I’m a writer. It’s a perk.
Last First Snow is a fantasy novel about the challenges of change in a world that looks a lot like our own—a postindustrial world of high magic where wizards wear pinstriped suits, where we can move mountains, soar through the air, and rain fire on the earth, but still struggle with the big questions: what are we doing here? Can we do it better?
All my Craft Sequence books have been about healing the world. That process has to start somewhere. It starts here. If you’ve been following along so far, this is the earliest book chronologically. It features Temoc, and Elayne Kevarian, and the King in Red, and a host of new characters, all making choices that will shape their future.
If you haven’t yet read the Craft Sequence, feel free to jump on here. The hope may be slim at this point—but it’s growing.
Read more about Gladstone’s Craft Sequence and its numbering system. Plus read excerpts from the previous novels—Three Parts Dead, Two Serpents Rise, and Full Fathom Five—here on Tor.com!
Max Gladstone writes books about the cutthroat world of international necromancy: wizards in pinstriped suits and gods with shareholders’ committees. You can follow him on Twitter.
Oh my,
earlyearlier in Kevarian’s history! Yes, yes, yes!(Max, you do know already Elayne is my favorite, right?)
@PrinceJvstin—I know that now! Writing an Elayne-and-Temoc-centric book was so damn fun I can’t even tell you.
So these books have always sounded great but I’ve been reluctant to hop on midstream. Is this the “beginning” in any meaningful sense, or is that not really a relevant way of thinking about the story you’re telling? Or should I accept that asking the author whether or not I should buy all his books instantly is probably not the best analytical approach?
Also I gotta tell you I’ve loved your stuff here on Tor. Great example of how to hook readers by writing stuff outside your actual fiction output. Whenever I end up reading your actual books I’m looking forward to being a booster.
Thanks! I’m so glad you’ve enjoyed the essays—there will be more to come in the near future.
As for jump-on points: I’ve tried to make each book stand on its own, Discworld style, so you can read them in any order. Three Parts Dead is probably the most traditional starting point, since that’s where all the world systems are put forth for the first time, but you shouldn’t have any trouble coming on board at Last First Snow—especially if you’re used to in medias res storytelling in the vein of Pratchett etc.
“I’ve never lived with a king,” I grump, “and basically nobody else has either.”
Actually, I -have- lived under a King. Well, Queen; I was born the subject of a Queen, one who traces her ancestry to a God(*) and lived most of my life in that status, until relatively recently.
I know precisely what dynastic loyalty feels like because I’ve felt it myself — still do, in fact. I’d be happy to see the US take the Windsors back. It would free the politicians from the burden of trying to embody the nation’s identity and historical continuity and free them to wheel and deal.
More generally, why write a fantasy novel about a world facing challenges much like our own, where magic is technology with the terminology changed and people lead lives basically similar to ours?
In that case, why not a mimetic novel that -is- our own world?
Or if you want more latitude to change events, why not a SFnal alternate history?
What is there particularly about -fantasy- that’s useful in that respect?
(*) Wodan, specifically.
I cast Vanessa Redgrave as my silverfox Kevarian in my head for Three Parts Dead.
Now I can cast turbofox Vanessa Redgrave circa Camelot for Last First Snow!
@5: There’s a big difference between living in a modern constitutional monarchy (you don’t say where you grew up, but I’m unaware of any absolute monarchs where the royal family would claim Wotanic descent, though, you know, learn something new every day!) and living in a medieval state like staple epic fantasies describe, of course.
As for the question of why write fantasy that corresponds to our lived experience but is nevertheless fantastical: secondary-world fantasy’s the perfect rhetorical foundation for writing about real but invisible forces and their effect on history. (For example: the King is the Land trope reifies the general truth that good monarchs pay attention to civil affairs, while bad ones don’t.) Alternate history implies that such invisible forces don’t in fact exist—since the alt-history story purports to tell what would happen if they did—which is different. Secret history in the Tim Powers model recounts how history was shaped by occult forces, but that’s also not quite my goal: the forces that interest me are invisible not because they’re hidden edge-case stuff, but because they’re too damn big to be seen at normal human distances. Fiction set in our ostensibly magic-less reality doesn’t quite work either, since to focus on these abstractions I’d have to slosh a ton of ink on theory, which tends to be the enemy of drama. Subcreated fantasy end-runs around these issues by externalizing metaphor. Take, for example, Elizabeth Bear’s Eternal Sky books: the world-redefining social effects of colonization rendered as a literal transformation of the sky over conquered territory! Or NK Jemisin’s Hundred Thousand Kingdoms, which reifies the threat of weapons of mass destruction by presenting them as chained gods. These are obviously not the only issues at play in these books, but the same effect could not have been accomplished in a more mimetic setting. So I get to play with existentialist theology and network dynamics and Seeing Like a State-style reality imposition directly, in my own subcreation.
Also it’s fun.
@6: I like it!
@MaxGladstone:
Since you are following your post. :-)
I look forward to reading your next book. First read the others with the Hugo packet, and really enjoyed them the best. You got my vote for the Campbell. Better luck when you next go for a Hugo.
And yes, you have such a different take on this world. So unlike others. But I’m not sure if I would want to live there. Visit sure.
Great news. Can’t wait!
I like seeing what Temmoc looks like (assuming that is him), but would also have liked to see Chris McGrath’s illustration of Ms. Kevarian (my mental image is Alex Kingston) as well as the King in Red (although that would be rather… different than the covers of previous books).
How fun that you’re monitoring this and responding. Thanks so much for the response; Three Parts Dead here I come!
@Brad_Tug: Thank you so much for the support! Fingers crossed re: rocket possibilities.
And yeah, I’m not sure I’d like to live in the Craftworld either. It’s an incredibly cool place, but a bit, um, lethal.
@casejord: It would have been very cool to see Ms. Kevarian through Chris’s eyes. I’ll need to write more books with her so he eventually has no choice. And yes, The King in Red would certainly present a… departure… for Chris. Though I feel confident he’d manage!
@MerchanterPride: Enjoy!
Max, as an amateur writer you simultaneously fill me with hope and despair every time I read your work or hear you speak (nice job at Vericon!).
Reading your thoughts on fantasy is at least as brain-tickling as the world you’ve built in your novels, if not more.
In short, you’ve got a way with words. Keep these essays (and the Craft stuff, too) coming, please!
@13– Wow, thank-you so much for the reply, Max. Look forward to all future books in the series.
Your post made me wonder- does Chris choose the covers? I think you might have explained it in a previous post, but if so, props to him, as his covers always seem to be very accurate to the text.
Max,
I have only one complaint: Three Parts Dead finished just as I felt I was really getting to know and like Tara. So far it has put me off reading the rest of your books because I want to know what she is doing now!
But this one sounds fun. I may have to stop worrying about Tara and move on :)
I only discovered Max Gladstone’s stuff last week. Max if you’re reading this, Three Parts Dead has more interesting concepts and interesting and complex characters. Tara is interesting, but I thought Abelard and Cat stole the show.
Anyway, thank you.
Ack! This is what I get for leaving a thread unattended. :)
@14 Danielrixy: Thank you so much! Keep reading. I don’t intend to stop, well, ever.
@15, Casejord: You’re welcome! Only apologies for the delay on this second round. To answer your question: I consult with my editor about possible ideas for the cover, and the result of our brainstorming goes to the art department, and ultimately to Chris, who works his magic based off the pitch. I wait to see the covers like I used to wait to unwrap Christmas presents.
@16, GuruJ: I just finished the second draft of Book 5, currently Four Parts Untitled. You won’t have to wait forever. But you should read the other books in the meantime! :)
@17, Pilgrim: Thank you! I love Cat and Abelard myself. I was very pleased that I could work Cat into Full Fathom Five. As for the future, plans are being planned!
What is the release date for Last First Snow? I love the Craft Sequence series to the Max!
@19, Puntificator: July is the date I have in my head, but I’m not sure if that gels with the date on Tor’s production calendar. Thanks for reading!
Can’t wait! Kopil and Kevarian are my favorites. July seems so far away.